Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 17:49:19
in reply to

Jonathan Toomim [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-02-26 📝 Original message:> On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:56 ...

📅 Original date posted:2016-02-26
📝 Original message:> On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Gregory Maxwell <greg at xiph.org> wrote:
> The batching was
> temporarily somewhat hobbled between 0.10 and 0.12 (especially when
> you had any abusive frequently pinging peers attached), but is now
> fully functional again and it now manages to batch many transactions
> per INV pretty effectively. T

Thanks for the response. I've been mostly using and working on 0.11-series versions, which very rarely send out INV batches. In my examination, about 85% of the packets had a single hash in it. Nice to know this is one of the other improvements in 0.12.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160225/83670a67/attachment.sig>;
Author Public Key
npub1pl6kcz00s7wgn6syh73dta0qm9sqpmtw4adv8rnm2w9fmynkw45sayj0hj