Laffy on Nostr: 3/ Murray, cont'd: This progress narrative prompted RBG to note in dissent that ...
3/ Murray, cont'd:
This progress narrative prompted RBG to note in dissent that throwing out the preclearance formula was like throwing out your umbrella in a rainstorm because you weren't getting wet. She was right.
SCOTUS didn't invalidate the whole preclearance regime--just the formula. And Congress could have written a new preclearance formula... if it weren't super-polarized and dysfunctional.
As it happened, Congress did not write a new formula. And the preclearance regime died.
Published at
2023-06-08 16:34:31Event JSON
{
"id": "498ff16df825dfa6bba5e5a09ed932c648df09bfebf71e28ec597447767222a6",
"pubkey": "43faba8b2cc565cb757af10a19784bd9fddb5badc2a881edb0baadb27b1fab46",
"created_at": 1686242071,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3ef8a340a604337f66e128fdb0b348e58be7e79ee2c88ac345763c60e9ccac83",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/GottaLaff/statuses/110509560379603034"
]
],
"content": "3/ Murray, cont'd:\n\nThis progress narrative prompted RBG to note in dissent that throwing out the preclearance formula was like throwing out your umbrella in a rainstorm because you weren't getting wet. She was right.\n\nSCOTUS didn't invalidate the whole preclearance regime--just the formula. And Congress could have written a new preclearance formula... if it weren't super-polarized and dysfunctional.\n\nAs it happened, Congress did not write a new formula. And the preclearance regime died.",
"sig": "1cd3b6987e58d5e20377b3522cecf3a3773d191789cfb56b55e5aaad1d6b0702ac48a793f92eab9c7c2ccb6ffd5ed9ede2b2664e3b9307dd325c31d7fddc21c7"
}