đ
Original date posted:2020-10-05
đ Original message:
Hi Bastien,
> I think that *in some cases*, fundees should be paying a portion of the commit-tx on-chain fees,
> otherwise we may end up with a web-of-trust network where channels would only exist between peers
> that trust each other, which is quite limiting (I'm hoping we can do better).
Agreed.
However in an anchor outputs future the funder only pays for the "backbone" fees of the channel and the fees necessary to secure the confirmation of transactions is paid in second stage by each interested party (*). It seems to me to be a reasonable middle-ground.
(*) Credits to ZmnSCPxj for pointing this out to me on IRC.
Darosior
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20201005/1f406e21/attachment.html>;
darosior [ARCHIVE] /
npub1pjâŚx22xp
2023-06-09 13:00:59
in reply to nevent1qâŚ9lrk
Author Public Key
npub1pj9022f74rzq7d5x7gnxje6wpsgk4r5jgeck8y5awd423ydhan3q7x22xpPublished at
2023-06-09 13:00:59Event JSON
{
"id": "4dec9a04fea228b0a2e33e93ada9f3a22da11fd034aea525ad86bab5165d64f9",
"pubkey": "0c8af5293ea8c40f3686f22669674e0c116a8e92467163929d736aa891b7ece2",
"created_at": 1686315659,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fec71d3de654367615cc4717048ad27af6f514e566116a304019e8b84f85ddb2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"cb342d26ab9707691a906c2378628944fb86246444a2b2d51ef5439e9d7a260d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f26569a10f83f6935797b8b53a87974fdcc1de6abd31e3b1a3a19bdaed8031cb"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2020-10-05\nđ Original message:\nHi Bastien,\n\n\u003e I think that *in some cases*, fundees should be paying a portion of the commit-tx on-chain fees,\n\u003e otherwise we may end up with a web-of-trust network where channels would only exist between peers\n\u003e that trust each other, which is quite limiting (I'm hoping we can do better).\n\nAgreed.\nHowever in an anchor outputs future the funder only pays for the \"backbone\" fees of the channel and the fees necessary to secure the confirmation of transactions is paid in second stage by each interested party (*). It seems to me to be a reasonable middle-ground.\n\n(*) Credits to ZmnSCPxj for pointing this out to me on IRC.\n\nDarosior\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/attachments/20201005/1f406e21/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "8482359176083ae86727cda048eb41dbb14d5a117645ec0720ba589cd615637f4cd7076a959ad5a4688a0691876964f6ddea897cd12dc6ed814d306da67c8b93"
}