Event JSON
{
"id": "4b75745044fb79f6e820c57e5fc3452ff884c480ca1e23d37611cb7671b2ba52",
"pubkey": "3f59b5c878411d8ef6a2bd9d4c4c690c030820c0ec185101cc963fa7b3043475",
"created_at": 1688487557,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"alannadurkinricher"
],
[
"t",
"colleenslevin"
],
[
"t",
"associatedpress"
],
[
"t",
"lgbtqia"
],
[
"t",
"lgbtq"
],
[
"t",
"lgbt"
],
[
"t",
"gayrights"
],
[
"t",
"wedding"
],
[
"t",
"website"
],
[
"t",
"supremecourt"
],
[
"t",
"SCOTUS"
],
[
"content-warning",
"Article explaining why SCOTUS wedding website case is unlikely to be overturned. Sharing to inform, not because I want the ruling upheld or want people to stop protesting the decision. Please don't shoot the messenger."
],
[
"mostr",
"https://kolektiva.social/users/shades/statuses/110656720576418617"
]
],
"content": "by #AlannaDurkinRicher \u0026 #ColleenSlevin in The #AssociatedPress:\n\n\"The would-be customer’s request was not the basis for Smith’s original lawsuit, nor was it cited by the high court as the reason for ruling in her favor. Legal standing, or the right to bring a lawsuit, generally requires the person bringing the case to show that they have suffered some sort of harm. But pre-enforcement challenges — like the one Smith brought — are allowed in certain cases if the person can show they face a credible threat of prosecution or sanctions unless they conform to the law.\"\n\nhttps://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-lgbtq-website-9c058addfdd581ce0ead81eb59660130\n\n#LGBTQIA #LGBTQ #LGBT #GayRights #wedding #website #SupremeCourt #SCOTUS",
"sig": "30acdde1c43bdea2eb5591607c60f2edce42ed1dedddaadd6f210ceb09b2f243764fea486f0262fc4ade8cb843cea14a353e65827e7e30d419b006febf160fd8"
}