Wladimir J. van der Laan [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐
Original date posted:2015-08-24 ๐ Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at ...
๐
Original date posted:2015-08-24
๐ Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen
> which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that
> it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is
> distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but
> not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some
> proposals may make this more useful in the future)"?
Yes, it makes sense to not explicitly exclude it.
Looks good to me.
Wladimir
Published at
2023-06-07 15:49:06Event JSON
{
"id": "4b7a5b1af2304c24eece0fb99618b082a8e8aae022748a2b00234e7b2880a343",
"pubkey": "5c0b7fca51fd4830b4d9f840de063faebeeabd3bb5dd118de9cdf50a6feaaf98",
"created_at": 1686152946,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"677b2789bd9260c9edc4dfff20558f27945c985e840da0da606941d73d12b50b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"47a59315bd7fe93decd42dfe186b9240337973889a70d789c7f00ced4b93b4c3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "๐
Original date posted:2015-08-24\n๐ Original message:On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo wrote:\n\u003e Its more of a statement of \"in the future, we expect things to happen\n\u003e which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that\n\u003e it is not against spec to do so\". Could reword it as \"NODE_BLOOM is\n\u003e distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but\n\u003e not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some\n\u003e proposals may make this more useful in the future)\"?\n\nYes, it makes sense to not explicitly exclude it. \nLooks good to me.\n\nWladimir",
"sig": "2c27c4f21b8f2cff49999884954af84f34c7421d510233d5a3659f5a126746f7ae9ec6ef1d449f832c1c81902d42ffcc74358e2a4a4c5b0a24e5e9c4fac310e6"
}