Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-08-15 📝 Original message:On Wednesday 15 August ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-08-15
📝 Original message:On Wednesday 15 August 2018 21:54:50 Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:24 PM Jude Nelson via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Can a miner identify which transactions came from your software simply by
> > running a copy themselves? If so, then they can censor your transactions
> > no matter how you encode them.
>
> Possibly, but in the IPFS case I suspect the latency required to inspect
> all hashes would likely impact the ability of the miner to succeed in the
> block. (True? I don’t touch mining software.)
Not true at all.
> Thus as long as all hashes look the same, and there are multiple content
> addressable schemes that use hashes that have to be searched in order to
> know to censor, you have to censor all or none.
Choosing not to mine transactions is not censorship.
Luke
Published at
2023-06-07 18:14:01Event JSON
{
"id": "49512b21662e52ab03f10f4272397ace57683d5b144a50b2448dd409f147a9df",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686161641,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"eccbd39bd966baef56b5939c955d566f9fe6d2296c2c463ce1c7b09a9df0388b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b3ce4066b6c6c46a30a963060930c24f800875dcd8b7be2ea80135789bd9ff8a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"2a2be7532ec03e16fa6ff38360d30cc714893870cbd9fafbefeb1df2df858c4d"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-08-15\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday 15 August 2018 21:54:50 Christopher Allen via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:24 PM Jude Nelson via bitcoin-dev \u003c\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e Can a miner identify which transactions came from your software simply by\n\u003e \u003e running a copy themselves? If so, then they can censor your transactions\n\u003e \u003e no matter how you encode them.\n\u003e\n\u003e Possibly, but in the IPFS case I suspect the latency required to inspect\n\u003e all hashes would likely impact the ability of the miner to succeed in the\n\u003e block. (True? I don’t touch mining software.)\n\nNot true at all.\n\n\u003e Thus as long as all hashes look the same, and there are multiple content\n\u003e addressable schemes that use hashes that have to be searched in order to\n\u003e know to censor, you have to censor all or none.\n\nChoosing not to mine transactions is not censorship.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "bb54fdcce89880e2b98519d46b0329b7fb84445c952e18b5b8ff9d8242fa90788e138a0ae60cc2e3267969be088c2e4eefd47412637b0bc1e624f1dd578225f5"
}