Braydon Fuller on Nostr: While that would be great, I don't think it's true. If the software is with ...

While that would be great, I don't think it's true. If the software is with permissive licensing with source code, it's effectively non-scarce and thus doesn't have the character of being property and isn't owned. This may feel wrong as everything has copyright be default and is "owned". However, it can't be owned, or centrally owned, and thus isn't a risk of centralization or a risk to freedom of speech.