#AI #GenerativeAI #GPAI #OpenAI #ChatGPT: "The split between Altman and the board at least partly seemed to fall along ideological lines, with Altman and Brockman in a camp known as “accelerationists” – people who believe AI should be deployed as quickly as possible – and “decelerationists” – people who believe it should be developed more slowly and with stronger guardrails. With Altman’s return, the former group takes the spoils.
“The people who seem to have won out in this case are the accelerationists,” said Sarah Kreps, a Cornell professor of government and the director of the Tech Policy Institute in the university’s school of public policy.
Kreps said we may see a reborn OpenAI that fully subscribes to the Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s “move fast and break things” mantra. Employees voted with their feet in the debate between moving more quickly or more carefully, she noted.
“What we’ll see is full steam ahead on AI research going forward. Then the question becomes, is it going to be totally unsafe, or will it have trials and errors? OpenAI may follow the Facebook model of moving quickly and realizing that the product is not always compatible with societal good,” she said."
https://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/23/huge-egos-are-in-play-behind-the-firing-and-rehiring-of-openais-sam-altman
Miguel Afonso Caetano /
npub1pw…r95z7
2023-11-25 21:27:45
Author Public Key
npub1pwuvltfvfme0d987k6rs3an6jnv9k2w32zqdlqt5hpy9u3cmv6ps2r95z7Published at
2023-11-25 21:27:45Event JSON
{
"id": "4ba7cd4ef1069cd6affcec9fff9b2f794d014ebac6f853ccf5fe31f95f9662f2",
"pubkey": "0bb8cfad2c4ef2f694feb68708f67a94d85b29d15080df8174b8485e471b6683",
"created_at": 1700947665,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"ai"
],
[
"t",
"generativeAI"
],
[
"t",
"gpai"
],
[
"t",
"openai"
],
[
"t",
"chatgpt"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://tldr.nettime.org/users/remixtures/statuses/111473306198533596",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "#AI #GenerativeAI #GPAI #OpenAI #ChatGPT: \"The split between Altman and the board at least partly seemed to fall along ideological lines, with Altman and Brockman in a camp known as “accelerationists” – people who believe AI should be deployed as quickly as possible – and “decelerationists” – people who believe it should be developed more slowly and with stronger guardrails. With Altman’s return, the former group takes the spoils.\n\n“The people who seem to have won out in this case are the accelerationists,” said Sarah Kreps, a Cornell professor of government and the director of the Tech Policy Institute in the university’s school of public policy.\n\nKreps said we may see a reborn OpenAI that fully subscribes to the Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg’s “move fast and break things” mantra. Employees voted with their feet in the debate between moving more quickly or more carefully, she noted.\n\n“What we’ll see is full steam ahead on AI research going forward. Then the question becomes, is it going to be totally unsafe, or will it have trials and errors? OpenAI may follow the Facebook model of moving quickly and realizing that the product is not always compatible with societal good,” she said.\"\n\nhttps://amp-theguardian-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/23/huge-egos-are-in-play-behind-the-firing-and-rehiring-of-openais-sam-altman",
"sig": "a68ab87bf451d451f816af32f8a4d02e3b4763f533d718c4030b0639bedfc3aea2457cefebe44217884ecb2ed1228095d292cff26cde20bd886694fc0f3ca46d"
}