Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 17:31:49
in reply to

xor at freenetproject.org [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: šŸ“… Original date posted:2016-01-19 šŸ“ Original message:On Monday, January 18, ...

šŸ“… Original date posted:2016-01-19
šŸ“ Original message:On Monday, January 18, 2016 12:14:16 PM Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote:
> It has been tested in git for almost half a year. This RC is the first
> binary release that contains the functionality.
>
> It is extremely unlikely that the wallet will eat your coins (always backup
> nevertheless), but I can't guarantee there won't be some issue where the
> wallet and chain get out of sync and you're forced to redownload the
> blockchain.

I think I asked the wrong way, sorry: My question was not really meant at
whether it is bug-free (testing that is the purpose of a release candidate, so
we of course don't know yet), but rather whether it is at least feature
complete now.

Remember, the previous v0.11.0 release notes said:
> Block pruning is currently incompatible with running a wallet due to the
> fact that block data is used for rescanning the wallet and importing keys
> or addresses (which require a rescan.) However, running the wallet with
> block pruning will be supported in the near future, subject to those
> limitations.

So I'm interested whether this limitation has been lifted, and the whole
feature is considered as finished.

If yes, I would highly recommend advertising it in the new release notes - as
said, the disk space reduction is a big deal.


Thank you!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160119/54b4bd69/attachment-0001.sig>;
Author Public Key
npub1n4mfz49w8xq76xc6uy55jlzjymk38gy5lswc9lrqksqqu4xlam7sft6mlq