📅 Original date posted:2022-02-21
📝 Original message:Goog morning ZmnSCPxj,
Context: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329
Maybe I should have rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others and it was not my intention in the email.
> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?
I care about the opinions especially if consensus rules are not changed and remain same as far as subsidy is concerned.
> Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.
I object to such assumptions about the founder of Bitcoin. Satoshi is more than a pseudonym and will stay alive forever.
--
Prayank
A3B1 E430 2298 178F
Feb 21, 2022, 14:32 by ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com:
> Good morning Prayank,
>
> (offlist)
>
>> Satoshi
>>
>
> I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general.
> If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself.
> If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?
> Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.
>
>
> Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking about the various arguments being presented.
>
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220221/8542f685/attachment.html>;
Prayank [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xw…c2lxh
2023-06-07 23:04:41
in reply to nevent1q…xnc2
Author Public Key
npub1xwdym5sne88xldc5809azwrgasp60ze27easgew8e7p3vj7qr7ssjc2lxhPublished at
2023-06-07 23:04:41Event JSON
{
"id": "4b9fdcc0a68632c28a6db14c1053f28f4aeeac5b51b3ef2c5aea9ad440bf1a4a",
"pubkey": "339a4dd213c9ce6fb7143bcbd13868ec03a78b2af67b0465c7cf83164bc01fa1",
"created_at": 1686179081,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7182508a59ef85626392280c00988bf4daa1631fd7174d4eea31c49fa1830cb2",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3dc7d07cc5c869776e6f4c9d95dccb7a14e61246154b1db510b426153f34ad4c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-02-21\n📝 Original message:Goog morning ZmnSCPxj,\n\nContext: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329\n\nMaybe I should have rephrased it and quote Satoshi. I agree I should not speak for others and it was not my intention in the email.\n\n\u003e If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?\n\nI care about the opinions especially if consensus rules are not changed and remain same as far as subsidy is concerned.\n\n\u003e Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.\n\nI object to such assumptions about the founder of Bitcoin. Satoshi is more than a pseudonym and will stay alive forever.\n\n-- \nPrayank\n\nA3B1 E430 2298 178F\n\n\n\nFeb 21, 2022, 14:32 by ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com:\n\n\u003e Good morning Prayank,\n\u003e\n\u003e (offlist)\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Satoshi\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general.\n\u003e If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak for himself.\n\u003e If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares what his opinion is?\n\u003e Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking about the various arguments being presented.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e ZmnSCPxj\n\u003e\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220221/8542f685/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "14d4a756a0253d66a84e966980c038ad39e34e7eec1ff0a6d0e2d031d37b22246bc9dce5b46146f8c63891c818c28427f7d54c972527a037c90f00f1bd5aa0ef"
}