馃搮 Original date posted:2015-08-10
馃摑 Original message:On Aug 10, 2015 4:12 PM, "Gavin Andresen" <gavinandresen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Jorge Tim贸n <jtimon at jtimon.cc> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Aug 7, 2015 5:55 PM, "Gavin Andresen" <gavinandresen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Executive summary: when networks get over-saturated, they become
unreliable. Unreliable is bad.
>
> Unreliable and expensive is extra bad, and that's where we're headed
without an increase to the max block size.
I'm not trying to be obstinate but I seriously can't see how they are
different.
When you say unreliable I think you mean "unreliable for cheap fee
transactions". Transactions with the highest fees will always confirm
reliably. For example, a 1 btc fee tx will probably always confirm very
reliably even if capacity never increases and demands increases a lot.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150810/7a3b9433/attachment.html>;
Jorge Tim贸n [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx鈥l2d8
2023-06-07 17:33:58
in reply to nevent1q鈥c0j
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:33:58Event JSON
{
"id": "4bc47f2cd40b002aab09c0778b0594a985c2efe865a885508ba868de830a9186",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159238,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0be39125a55b736c93365735a614c6c3adbad06ad3effa6f21e6b42bef7ccb51",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e82782ab0d86bf113de770b790e89e6986079be72fa443c4bc3e0fd34180eb42",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"57b831beec00e3fa1533d67d4df61ac49b53ea93452f7c3f6a43b682f0e5221d"
]
],
"content": "馃搮 Original date posted:2015-08-10\n馃摑 Original message:On Aug 10, 2015 4:12 PM, \"Gavin Andresen\" \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Jorge Tim贸n \u003cjtimon at jtimon.cc\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e On Aug 7, 2015 5:55 PM, \"Gavin Andresen\" \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Executive summary: when networks get over-saturated, they become\nunreliable. Unreliable is bad.\n\u003e\n\u003e Unreliable and expensive is extra bad, and that's where we're headed\nwithout an increase to the max block size.\n\nI'm not trying to be obstinate but I seriously can't see how they are\ndifferent.\nWhen you say unreliable I think you mean \"unreliable for cheap fee\ntransactions\". Transactions with the highest fees will always confirm\nreliably. For example, a 1 btc fee tx will probably always confirm very\nreliably even if capacity never increases and demands increases a lot.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150810/7a3b9433/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "54c6be538ff3f614a29e57686ba8add9ebefdc6fd67624303b14f6a117b4a35cb4bdf9add859ceed13555158c0c6e2de7a693c37b4025e8a1ee7d147204e6b98"
}