📅 Original date posted:2016-01-26
📝 Original message:On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:17:12 AM Toby Padilla wrote:
> I don't think every application of OP_RETURN could be classified as "spam".
Perhaps not, but in this context I cannot think of any non-spam use cases.
Use cases should come before changes to support them.
> I also don't think burning the value is going to dissuade anyone from going
> down that route. I don't think lost value is better for anyone.
Lost value is better because it has a cost to the spammer, and deflates the
rest of the bitcoins.
Luke
Luke Dashjr [ARCHIVE] /
npub1tf…rfq0n
2023-06-07 17:48:10
in reply to nevent1q…4y2d
Author Public Key
npub1tfk373zg9dnmtvxnpnq7s2dkdgj37rwfj3yrwld7830qltmv8qps8rfq0nSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:48:10Event JSON
{
"id": "4446383fa1ec97c708b7b4602a98be2563bdba9ab1164db43101f6d80441ca64",
"pubkey": "5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803",
"created_at": 1686160090,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"368032d333e01794ac3e7b97c278de084cce6e6228857d943836fb1a934a5739",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"20d08de91d82a50c068f93b145a609a5479b5d3924827a89e0f954385171707e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"d94a4049e1eafdb70a0dc089351c47ae335f75b3408012d8495d51889ad9a292"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-01-26\n📝 Original message:On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:17:12 AM Toby Padilla wrote:\n\u003e I don't think every application of OP_RETURN could be classified as \"spam\".\n\nPerhaps not, but in this context I cannot think of any non-spam use cases.\nUse cases should come before changes to support them.\n\n\u003e I also don't think burning the value is going to dissuade anyone from going\n\u003e down that route. I don't think lost value is better for anyone.\n\nLost value is better because it has a cost to the spammer, and deflates the \nrest of the bitcoins.\n\nLuke",
"sig": "a4b3b5a26a479e850a7839a61c2b6718b8280c1b5df504d17372f85f198f700a229f9ce8777c8056c15c468cdc2032b06d756efd58451d594291df6d0f2cb481"
}