š
Original date posted:2022-08-04
š Original message:My sincere apologies, the link returns a 404 (trailing dot). The correct link to the BIP is https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/bips/blob/master/bip-notatether-signedmessage.mediawiki
-Ali
------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, August 4th, 2022 at 3:18 PM, Ali Sherief <ali at notatether.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a new BIP, called notatether-signedmessage. It can be viewed at https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/bips/blob/master/bip-notatether-signedmessage.mediawiki.
>
> For those who want a quick summary, it defines a step-by-step process for signing and verifying messages from legacy, native/nested segwit, and taproot addresses. It does not define a new signature format itself, except in the case of Taproot. For those addresses, I have defined a signature format that has 1 byte header/recID, 64 bytes signature, and 32 bytes x coordinate of a public key. This is required to run the BIP340 Schnorr verify algorithm using only the signature - and the header byte is added for backwards compatibility. Otherwise, it completely integrates BIP137 signatures.
>
> I am planning to move that format to its own BIP as soon as possible, in lieu that it is unacceptable to define formats in an Informational BIP.
>
> Please leave your comments in this mailing list. CC'ing BIP editors.
>
> - Ali
Ali Sherief [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xqā¦q2u5f
2023-06-07 23:12:29
in reply to nevent1qā¦53wz
Author Public Key
npub1xq96jnxfzrdq4zgre20yqjrjsd29vcw8ymypl4v59cg6q6p66cts8q2u5fPublished at
2023-06-07 23:12:29Event JSON
{
"id": "4cec973cabea7b8dbb0651591d188ba90c2997ade51cd3a9074885aa312bff6d",
"pubkey": "300ba94cc910da0a8903ca9e40487283545661c726c81fd5942e11a0683ad617",
"created_at": 1686179549,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fb0c51c47fb0dc7c36668ecc3d86fd399320d3c6e12d870c36c10551b62e25cc",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a526865be9822e8933096a54a5d5d5f2b71008f8c16cebecedd1b55df332ee22",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"300ba94cc910da0a8903ca9e40487283545661c726c81fd5942e11a0683ad617"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2022-08-04\nš Original message:My sincere apologies, the link returns a 404 (trailing dot). The correct link to the BIP is https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/bips/blob/master/bip-notatether-signedmessage.mediawiki\n\n-Ali\n\n------- Original Message -------\nOn Thursday, August 4th, 2022 at 3:18 PM, Ali Sherief \u003cali at notatether.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\n\u003e Hi,\n\u003e\n\u003e I have created a new BIP, called notatether-signedmessage. It can be viewed at https://github.com/ZenulAbidin/bips/blob/master/bip-notatether-signedmessage.mediawiki.\n\u003e\n\u003e For those who want a quick summary, it defines a step-by-step process for signing and verifying messages from legacy, native/nested segwit, and taproot addresses. It does not define a new signature format itself, except in the case of Taproot. For those addresses, I have defined a signature format that has 1 byte header/recID, 64 bytes signature, and 32 bytes x coordinate of a public key. This is required to run the BIP340 Schnorr verify algorithm using only the signature - and the header byte is added for backwards compatibility. Otherwise, it completely integrates BIP137 signatures.\n\u003e\n\u003e I am planning to move that format to its own BIP as soon as possible, in lieu that it is unacceptable to define formats in an Informational BIP.\n\u003e\n\u003e Please leave your comments in this mailing list. CC'ing BIP editors.\n\u003e\n\u003e - Ali",
"sig": "b6e471b44ac176d21047f463b3549525dd4cbada122e72c3abf9d55f68b63ec10c0192683af6868d28205ddf3f99ffb1c3be97f558bcf5406ae46d8ff5d83b9b"
}