Matt Whitlock [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-09-01 📝 Original message:On Wednesday, 2 September ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-09-01
📝 Original message:On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 12:46 am, Jorge Timón wrote:
> But again, the main issue is that we don't want a central authority to
> register unique unique and memorable chain name strings.
Why not? There's a central registry of MIME types. And there's a central registry of TCP/UDP port number assignments. The BIP describing the "blockchain" URI scheme is published by a central authority. For cases where assigning names to numbers is uncontroversial, central authorities don't cause any problems.
Published at
2023-06-07 17:39:10Event JSON
{
"id": "4c5afa5cee2fead283edc8b3da88e5d17d0454331d51178f13093a2adb887205",
"pubkey": "f00d0858b09287e941ccbc491567cc70bdbc62d714628b167c1b76e7fef04d91",
"created_at": 1686159550,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"adae20868ecaee3485c1f73b7cbb076c6c1ffdd38a33c7ea438129dbb9aa31c8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e7a8a34cc55a1cfa9817998fa918c6304cb210f057d9e9815af8f62e38cc2569",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-01\n📝 Original message:On Wednesday, 2 September 2015, at 12:46 am, Jorge Timón wrote:\n\u003e But again, the main issue is that we don't want a central authority to\n\u003e register unique unique and memorable chain name strings.\n\nWhy not? There's a central registry of MIME types. And there's a central registry of TCP/UDP port number assignments. The BIP describing the \"blockchain\" URI scheme is published by a central authority. For cases where assigning names to numbers is uncontroversial, central authorities don't cause any problems.",
"sig": "97f2851e4ebaf92771b9e19c3d7a97a52f45efa1ebf38ff045d7e34adf39286ad9318a9974269ea9a79214807433c124cc5d64aed156aaeab6ed81f506962097"
}