📅 Original date posted:2015-11-24
📝 Original message:I agree, I believe the first name that an op with equivalent functionality
had was simply op_maturity.
At least I remember we discussed such an opcode when discussing pegged
sidechains' design.
I kind of dislike the check_x_verify naming pattern. We want all new
operands to return if whatever they're checking/verifying fails, fine. Do
we have to repeat this redundant naming pattern forever due to that
discovery?
I hope not, but if that's the case my vote is for CMV.
As said before, I believe the documentation and code comments can become
much more clear with this change.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151124/5b9476f9/attachment.html>;
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 17:45:07
in reply to nevent1q…j763
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:45:07Event JSON
{
"id": "4c64d9450cb13cd93812d0e9cd035eab796a34d9cf979842240369bff1e7f355",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159907,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"65176681f906c98989ff4af1f66f139d152a7b5de4ac302f54d83aa23ee2fe52",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d286090e8492102531ec8f7b7e36cffec7fccddd3e83384619cc2a12e65092f2",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-11-24\n📝 Original message:I agree, I believe the first name that an op with equivalent functionality\nhad was simply op_maturity.\nAt least I remember we discussed such an opcode when discussing pegged\nsidechains' design.\n\nI kind of dislike the check_x_verify naming pattern. We want all new\noperands to return if whatever they're checking/verifying fails, fine. Do\nwe have to repeat this redundant naming pattern forever due to that\ndiscovery?\nI hope not, but if that's the case my vote is for CMV.\nAs said before, I believe the documentation and code comments can become\nmuch more clear with this change.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151124/5b9476f9/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "5945d6145971c2985e98cd494dbdbf233e7388875e78b0ce6992c6e59729cdf9f92dff419d182bd778244faf1510ca46fa6cf4eeddde2daa30c6cb9a4dce9942"
}