đź“… Original date posted:2015-08-19
đź“ť Original message:Alex,
With all due respect, right now the biggest challenge facing Bitcoin is not technical but political. I would love to see this list go back to technical discussions, but unfortunately, until this political stuff is resolved, even technical discussion is purely philosophical as there’s little chance of actually making good progress on consensus…which in a space where everything depends on consensus pretty much makes everything else moot.
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is a message that I wrote and had hoped that all the core devs would sign on to, but I failed to finish organizing it. So I'll just say it from myself.
>
> There has been a valuable discussion over the last several months regarding a hard fork with respect to block size. However the sheer volume of email and proportion of discussion that is more philosophical than technical has rendered this list almost unusable for its primary purpose of technical discussion related to Bitcoin development. Many of us share the blame for letting the discourse run off topic to such a degree, and we hope that an appeal for individual self restraint will allow this list to return to a higher signal-to-noise ratio.
> -Please consider the degree to which any email you send is related to technical development before sending it.
> -Please consider how many emails you are sending to this list regarding the same topic.
> This list is not appropriate for an endless back and forth debate on the philosophical underpinnings of Bitcoin. Although such a debate may be worthwhile it should be taken to another forum for discussion. Every email you send is received by hundreds of developers who value their time as much as you value yours. If your intended audience isn't really the majority of them, perhaps private communication would be more appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/35b4ec1b/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/35b4ec1b/attachment.sig>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-07 17:37:12
in reply to nevent1q…0enc
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-07 17:37:12Event JSON
{
"id": "4ec397014c65502b6b4aafc03fb5698bc075b96ed1ff2705477310e0fe5ee54a",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686159432,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7a43d779bbefb1f959af3d48f56a7a2a4920b8fedaa5ed69267cdbeca7d64831",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c255c25502d14239486ea8d4a1ee9eec8251fc429ffc540ae1352c83dbad67a8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"78aa6925095b629d95a9e79aed6ed9da0973239bc6eedf11af42240f0e1d755c"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-19\n📝 Original message:Alex,\n\nWith all due respect, right now the biggest challenge facing Bitcoin is not technical but political. I would love to see this list go back to technical discussions, but unfortunately, until this political stuff is resolved, even technical discussion is purely philosophical as there’s little chance of actually making good progress on consensus…which in a space where everything depends on consensus pretty much makes everything else moot.\n\n\u003e On Aug 19, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e This is a message that I wrote and had hoped that all the core devs would sign on to, but I failed to finish organizing it. So I'll just say it from myself.\n\u003e \n\u003e There has been a valuable discussion over the last several months regarding a hard fork with respect to block size. However the sheer volume of email and proportion of discussion that is more philosophical than technical has rendered this list almost unusable for its primary purpose of technical discussion related to Bitcoin development. Many of us share the blame for letting the discourse run off topic to such a degree, and we hope that an appeal for individual self restraint will allow this list to return to a higher signal-to-noise ratio.\n\u003e -Please consider the degree to which any email you send is related to technical development before sending it.\n\u003e -Please consider how many emails you are sending to this list regarding the same topic.\n\u003e This list is not appropriate for an endless back and forth debate on the philosophical underpinnings of Bitcoin. Although such a debate may be worthwhile it should be taken to another forum for discussion. Every email you send is received by hundreds of developers who value their time as much as you value yours. If your intended audience isn't really the majority of them, perhaps private communication would be more appropriate.\n\u003e \n\u003e Thanks,\n\u003e Alex\n\u003e \n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/35b4ec1b/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 842 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150819/35b4ec1b/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "6f301b17a4f09999fd4988f9bcb0d4fa889250f510e77d1e9db96905736a863b8c5a9c9a2c1caad1c1207f42aa8143b573ba538e370487b6832199a85dd67d8c"
}