Polarized opinions, rooting for factions, black or white.
When you try to analyze complex issues impartially, the "but which side are you on?"
This happens mainly because belonging to defined ideological groups is rewarded, while independent thinking generates suspicion ("gatekeeper"!).
It's understandable, the convenience of identifying with a defined faction is a source of emotional security and a sense of shared identity, but power thrives on these opposing faction dynamics.
Those who choose intellectual autonomy, critically observing reality without adhering to pre-packaged positions, are not viewed favorably, he threatens the established order of the polarized debate.
Those who try to understand the issues in depth do not shout slogans, do not take sides a priori, but first observe, study, reflect and evaluate.
This is a frowned upon modus operandi, which is poorly reconciled with the logic of organized belonging, we have experienced it over the years.
We are convinced that the freedom of individual thought and not affiliation with structures that primarily pursue power is a sign of honesty towards oneself.
Better to be looked at with suspicion than to take care of the comfortable belonging to a collective.
You remain on the margins, but the benefits are priceless.
#GrayThinking 🧠 #NoFactionLoyalty #DecentralizedMind ⚡ #SovereignIntellect #QuestionEverything #AgainstGroupthink #TruthOverTribe #NonAligned #CostOfTruth 💎 #NostrCommunity #RejectEchoChambers #AutonomousThought #PowerCritique #MarginsNotMainstream #IdeologicalFluidity #FactionFree