aidan on Nostr: That seems like the closest approximation. But still there is something different ...
That seems like the closest approximation. But still there is something different about the fungibility of sats versus a feature that can only be bought once.
In any case, kudos for getting this in place and maybe we’ll see Apple formalize the legitimacy of this use-case in the rules so that more apps can confidently go down this path.
Published at
2023-12-02 19:29:36Event JSON
{
"id": "42b326b2a1b516fbec7e784392b5f2a9787ce9ba6c487b3a1165150ebbd3fd1f",
"pubkey": "9a98e65b211f0a455b869ee06eec2a99b24315ce684530dc5e7db9899fb678e3",
"created_at": 1701545376,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5be969fec67dd2b176cc27bf012ba5266a8d49565e3ad1135d7d28e2e3f7582d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"97b988fbf4f8880493f925711e1bd806617b508fd3d28312288507e42f8a3368"
]
],
"content": "That seems like the closest approximation. But still there is something different about the fungibility of sats versus a feature that can only be bought once.\n\nIn any case, kudos for getting this in place and maybe we’ll see Apple formalize the legitimacy of this use-case in the rules so that more apps can confidently go down this path.",
"sig": "179f61873c28510ce20f658743a4c158efdab085f93709d9eccb3440a267f4a372cd4d1397ea87db35786cc8cf5232b7bd4219100e5770ec68b788bd62f8eb38"
}