I fully support greater client app controls on the content they see and ingest. People can tag their published content with whatever. The problem is if content never gets to devices (or opt-in pre-filtered) to enable client choice - there is a hidden censorship layer.
The proposal above however did not state the above as a goal, nor core value.
Instead however it talked about labelling content specifically for moderation, ransoms making decisions about the legality of content, and relay operators complying with special events no different to the fraud filled DCMA takedowns we have today.
There is nothing novel about this idea or concept. It’s the same unworkable, easy to fake, hard to validate problem with all moderation today.
wakoinc / Blake
npub1kt…rmrvj
2023-05-01 17:48:59
in reply to nevent1q…2g2z
Author Public Key
npub1ktw5qzt7f5ztrft0kwm9lsw34tef9xknplvy936ddzuepp6yf9dsjrmrvjPublished at
2023-05-01 17:48:59Event JSON
{
"id": "42f16eece129918754a97e002f68545f3e4a546e2411972830c5f3e26029a6ba",
"pubkey": "b2dd40097e4d04b1a56fb3b65fc1d1aaf2929ad30fd842c74d68b9908744495b",
"created_at": 1682963339,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5fe5eb146cd32bf481428cfc669bed57804f8e5c29a375f4bb43399c863ac781",
""
],
[
"e",
"e240af715c561f8ed9157ddf3ce59e714ce73bd388f36f0f24f42267dbec504e"
],
[
"p",
"3356de61b39647931ce8b2140b2bab837e0810c0ef515bbe92de0248040b8bdd"
],
[
"p",
"bf943b7165fca616a483c6dc701646a29689ab671110fcddba12a3a5894cda15"
],
[
"p",
"667205eb525aa4a794859b2bd2bdd16e64ff57fd600880500fc53cdbf476439e"
],
[
"p",
"76c71aae3a491f1d9eec47cba17e229cda4113a0bbb6e6ae1776d7643e29cafa"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
],
[
"p",
"d0a1ffb8761b974cec4a3be8cbcb2e96a7090dcf465ffeac839aa4ca20c9a59e"
],
[
"p",
"d0a1ffb8761b974cec4a3be8cbcb2e96a7090dcf465ffeac839aa4ca20c9a59e"
]
],
"content": "I fully support greater client app controls on the content they see and ingest. People can tag their published content with whatever. The problem is if content never gets to devices (or opt-in pre-filtered) to enable client choice - there is a hidden censorship layer. \n\nThe proposal above however did not state the above as a goal, nor core value.\n\nInstead however it talked about labelling content specifically for moderation, ransoms making decisions about the legality of content, and relay operators complying with special events no different to the fraud filled DCMA takedowns we have today.\n\nThere is nothing novel about this idea or concept. It’s the same unworkable, easy to fake, hard to validate problem with all moderation today. ",
"sig": "76069ddb036a2eb8138aed2fcc8825fa81d189072e0142ca3750d1f5e286e04f97955b8174831a44552e7f47abb54e45b84841ea48f57a4274845ae9367174b1"
}