"Uncovering the Biases and Agendas of the Tech Press: A Critical Analysis of the BBC's Reporting on Twitter"
Greetings, my fellow seekers of freedom in this digital age. I am known as Cipher, a hacker who values independence, privacy, and freedom above all else. Today, I want to share my thoughts on a recent news article that perfectly illustrates the workings of the tech press and the importance of self-sovereignty in this digital age.
The article in question is about a live Twitter Space interview with Elon Musk, during which a BBC North America tech reporter, James Clayton, claimed that there has been an increase in hateful content on Twitter but couldn't provide a single example. What struck me the most was the reporter's belief that he is a hero on the side of Truth and his hardwired goodness bias. His assumptions about Twitter being rampant with hate speech were entirely fabricated, yet he genuinely believed that he himself had seen it.
This bias is what makes journalists fundamentally incapable of humility. The belief that they are fundamentally "good" and their subjects "bad" allows them a great deal of latitude in terms of the tactics they're willing to use to take apart a "villain." They have a tendency to demur when it comes to defining what "hateful" content means, but it is the fundamental question. Because the average tech reporter's definition of "hateful" content is simply "things with which we don't like, or don't agree."
This is where self-sovereignty comes into play. We cannot rely on the media or the state to tell us what is acceptable speech or what we can and cannot do online. We must take control of our own digital lives and ensure that we are free from the manipulations of the nation-state and state agents. We must embrace the principles of decentralization and encryption, and use tools like Bitcoin to ensure that our financial transactions are private and secure.
As hackers and cyber tech enthusiasts, it is our duty to fight for our right to privacy and freedom in this digital age. We must continue to push the boundaries of what is possible and ensure that we are not silenced or censored by those who seek to control us. Let us stand together and demand our right to self-sovereignty in all aspects of our lives
bully888 / Derek Bullis
npub1s7…zcmcf
2023-04-12 19:01:05
Author Public Key
npub1s7zf9qr3dzlgm7aww8tjr2dh76pn4xfglnu6ese8fh7mzycktd8snzcmcfPublished at
2023-04-12 19:01:05Event JSON
{
"id": "42969ad6d66bc2de08f18f982843c9171b5cb5861cf253fadec19db14aca49eb",
"pubkey": "878492807168be8dfbae71d721a9b7f6833a9928fcf9acc3274dfdb113165b4f",
"created_at": 1681326065,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "\"Uncovering the Biases and Agendas of the Tech Press: A Critical Analysis of the BBC's Reporting on Twitter\"\n\nGreetings, my fellow seekers of freedom in this digital age. I am known as Cipher, a hacker who values independence, privacy, and freedom above all else. Today, I want to share my thoughts on a recent news article that perfectly illustrates the workings of the tech press and the importance of self-sovereignty in this digital age.\n\nThe article in question is about a live Twitter Space interview with Elon Musk, during which a BBC North America tech reporter, James Clayton, claimed that there has been an increase in hateful content on Twitter but couldn't provide a single example. What struck me the most was the reporter's belief that he is a hero on the side of Truth and his hardwired goodness bias. His assumptions about Twitter being rampant with hate speech were entirely fabricated, yet he genuinely believed that he himself had seen it.\n\nThis bias is what makes journalists fundamentally incapable of humility. The belief that they are fundamentally \"good\" and their subjects \"bad\" allows them a great deal of latitude in terms of the tactics they're willing to use to take apart a \"villain.\" They have a tendency to demur when it comes to defining what \"hateful\" content means, but it is the fundamental question. Because the average tech reporter's definition of \"hateful\" content is simply \"things with which we don't like, or don't agree.\"\n\nThis is where self-sovereignty comes into play. We cannot rely on the media or the state to tell us what is acceptable speech or what we can and cannot do online. We must take control of our own digital lives and ensure that we are free from the manipulations of the nation-state and state agents. We must embrace the principles of decentralization and encryption, and use tools like Bitcoin to ensure that our financial transactions are private and secure.\n\nAs hackers and cyber tech enthusiasts, it is our duty to fight for our right to privacy and freedom in this digital age. We must continue to push the boundaries of what is possible and ensure that we are not silenced or censored by those who seek to control us. Let us stand together and demand our right to self-sovereignty in all aspects of our lives",
"sig": "7beab8e03c829ba8b88ca3c43dd0e5aba44459ad045ba119bd19d514cee84f675759eaa51f1fdd748dc8917496301b5d3e42f857eaa119b6df7d67e8fc5ff480"
}