📅 Original date posted:2014-09-25
📝 Original message:There was some discussion of having nodes relay double-spends in order
to alert the network about double spend attempts.
A lot more users will be using SPV wallets in the future, and one of
the techniques SPV clients use to judge how likely a transaction is to
be confirmed is if it propagates across the network. I wonder if and
when double-spend relaying is introduced, if nodes should also send
BIP61 reject messages or something along those lines to indicate which
transactions those nodes believe to be invalid, but are relaying
anyway.
This would be subject to sybil attacks, as is monitoring propagation,
however it does still increase the cost of performing a 0 confirmation
double spend attack on an SPV client above just relaying double-spends
without indicating if a node believes the transaction to be valid.
Aaron Voisine
breadwallet.com
Aaron Voisine [ARCHIVE] /
npub18g…knkzl
2023-06-07 15:25:57
in reply to nevent1q…fj2h
Author Public Key
npub18gjvug29c4yg46lmplq38e75gg6wn5mn8taytckcsr4jt8p74h3s5knkzlPublished at
2023-06-07 15:25:57Event JSON
{
"id": "43b125f70e46911db995acf65f3f36d9abe5f71c006fb4733345c989157d3743",
"pubkey": "3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3",
"created_at": 1686151557,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4f9ac54bd6567a8c3e1bbdc8600514d9552b8a33dc3e70bf70216815782b2480",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-09-25\n📝 Original message:There was some discussion of having nodes relay double-spends in order\nto alert the network about double spend attempts.\n\nA lot more users will be using SPV wallets in the future, and one of\nthe techniques SPV clients use to judge how likely a transaction is to\nbe confirmed is if it propagates across the network. I wonder if and\nwhen double-spend relaying is introduced, if nodes should also send\nBIP61 reject messages or something along those lines to indicate which\ntransactions those nodes believe to be invalid, but are relaying\nanyway.\n\nThis would be subject to sybil attacks, as is monitoring propagation,\nhowever it does still increase the cost of performing a 0 confirmation\ndouble spend attack on an SPV client above just relaying double-spends\nwithout indicating if a node believes the transaction to be valid.\n\nAaron Voisine\nbreadwallet.com",
"sig": "72082b7b5e318e0a64cd82f70784249e3b3179951e1ddf380cbaae317dc40a075c66c64f558de015df6906c984c17e59582c71c6e4c3d48134b582789853e79a"
}