Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-08-23 16:36:12
in reply to

M.S. Bellows, Jr. on Nostr: npub1zfn5n…nyxu0 This is the clearest explanation I've seen yet of Woodward's ...

This is the clearest explanation I've seen yet of Woodward's conflicts and Smith's strategery:

"The D.C. grand jury obtained video evidence that contradicted the sworn testimony of De Oliveira and Taveras. So now they had a potential perjury charge hanging over them, as well as possible obstruction charges. The Justice Department sent Taveras a target letter saying he was the subject of a grand jury investigation due to his “false sworn denial” before the grand jury earlier.

"Imagine you are attorney Woodward, and your client Taveras receives such a letter. If you advise Taveras to testify truthfully, that will implicate and possibly condemn your other client, Nauta. But if you advise him not to correct his testimony, you could be condemning him to a perjury charge.

"That’s what a real conflict looks like. You can’t help one of your clients without hurting the other.

"At this point, the government moved for a hearing to resolve the conflict. This is called a “Garcia” hearing after the case United States v. Garcia, which first addressed what should be done in such an untenable situation.

"And wow were there fireworks at that hearing. When the judge made independent counsel (a federal public defender) available to Taveras, and when that lawyer explained the stakes and the risks to him, Taveras promptly fired his Trump lawyer, Woodward. He then retracted his prior testimony and, according to the government, “provided information that implicated Nauta, De Oliveira, and Trump in efforts to delete security camera footage.”
Author Public Key
npub1zlhm6cl9d5y0f8wejuz0f7thym3kj9az8k57p8c2he3gfv3qpxjsmlss2l