📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05
📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> History has shown that for many decision making processes this doesn't
> work,
> and this argument has been made to Core.
> Until today this was essentially a rule that hurt the things that Mike was
> really passionate about.
> Today this hurts the things that some other devs are passionate about.
>
If you are referring to some of Mike's PRs that were either refused or
reverted, it was because they where substantial technical objections to
them. This isn't even in the same ballpark.
Surely you see the absurdity of arguing against soft forks after we
successfully used them already for BIP34 and BIP66?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/bc7c4a65/attachment.html>;
Btc Drak [ARCHIVE] /
npub1lh…zg7ed
2023-06-07 17:42:41
in reply to nevent1q…n08v
Author Public Key
npub1lhe3qfx2q5m7mq5d39waepf9lzhsy0cdey66svn63fyk6rt6n7ps7zg7edPublished at
2023-06-07 17:42:41Event JSON
{
"id": "4d59dd93a91abc9fc0a885fe3d78afe7d9ad5cac5e1a2bfb0207f0e79f517dc6",
"pubkey": "fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83",
"created_at": 1686159761,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8b171b0a181c0ea41f6054eb15f1f19559c90fd9ce9e5f5fc159720aea23cfd9",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2f6b237bd0ecdce427b83de5b7187b409ac99dccb702e61e0be2721cc1b35f05",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dcb947d818dbfd7cf0baf26c0d5eb606b5a32336c5483fb53e05146315833ca7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e History has shown that for many decision making processes this doesn't\n\u003e work,\n\u003e and this argument has been made to Core.\n\u003e Until today this was essentially a rule that hurt the things that Mike was\n\u003e really passionate about.\n\u003e Today this hurts the things that some other devs are passionate about.\n\u003e\n\nIf you are referring to some of Mike's PRs that were either refused or\nreverted, it was because they where substantial technical objections to\nthem. This isn't even in the same ballpark.\n\nSurely you see the absurdity of arguing against soft forks after we\nsuccessfully used them already for BIP34 and BIP66?\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151005/bc7c4a65/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "dce78ef5fa2fa04cd9feab6ca40e571f542f459be45aa23343e51e6ba354253de3b0bbd07ee748cd1a65e9ce03442443e23500c484000fb11996481152f381fa"
}