Event JSON
{
"id": "4d3e9df3db7319ca068546a072f63f00a9c9158939cc5821e8e38129010a3daa",
"pubkey": "fa6a6067b757006a74a46505c584f62a28c5e8f24a70c67c0740ec4730647b22",
"created_at": 1704280643,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"b9925d4eb0616a0aeb63b28a60700ecb9d9c7d4f3c5251d1cdfcff4c8f149a7c",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b2a729af72f53eaf7a64944a3b4fcc1a5c4e4476852b80513bf405183c484187",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"82df98d71fcdfabcc64d81abe4279d50283cde9d804593b6f337ff9e7c01b639",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://eupolicy.social/users/whvholst/statuses/111691736224575778",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1hxf96n4sv94q46mrk29xquqwewwecl2083f9r5wdlnl5erc5nf7q4mg8qu I am one of \"those people\" in the sense that it is deeply unwise to put material provisions in recitals. They are meant to be explanatory context, not the rules themselves. And there is jurisprudence out there that agrees with me. So yes, recitals are not good enough and it is better not to present this as a sufficient win for open source.",
"sig": "c799cb51e474e0502ac56e31bf08f3eec8d53ac54188e0c56d31ddf8aa2b35b15742d1f70cacb7ac3f959cc3b8a950830bbd029c2e362b71ff5aa62f128fd62c"
}