Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 17:58:44
in reply to

Staf Verhaegen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02 📝 Original message:Jared Lee Richardson via ...

📅 Original date posted:2017-04-02
📝 Original message:Jared Lee Richardson via bitcoin-dev schreef op wo 29-03-2017 om 12:07
[-0700]:

>
> It is all very unhealthy for Bitcoin. Both sides need to accept that
> microtransactions from all humans cannot go on-chain, and that never
> increasing the blocksize doesn't mean millions of home users will run
> nodes. The node argument breaks down economically and the
> microtransaction argument is an impossible mountain for a blockchain
> to climb.

What annoys me are people that seem to think that in order to promote
layer two scaling on-chain scaling has to be severely limited. I am
convinced that in order for layer 2 to flourish enough on-chain
bandwidth has to be available, not artificial scarceness.
In order to allow more on-chain bandwidth also sharding solutions should
be investigated so not every transactions has to pass through each node
and without the need of channels but protocol between nodes.

greets,
Staf.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170402/3f524adf/attachment.sig>;
Author Public Key
npub1jnsu3jfahqad3e9p5tj45nqc3av6ekhxqu3fsttg5t49s0260gtsaa6tx7