IDW on Nostr: Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return ...
Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return data fields we should remove the filter from nodes.
Instead I suggest we consider a consensus rule change (fork) to block miners from including large OP-return transactions.
Published at
2025-05-03 00:40:57Event JSON
{
"id": "4a9810be1c5e9db6d6bdc5404613f8cf3a923b375c447bb0d2c10bba79f2c62f",
"pubkey": "cb2f4f62fe3ffe3cb6c82b70ca35dfb0aeb724375cb2916837af8ce65bc73c61",
"created_at": 1746232857,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"885e3f4d2f4f06cb726ac4a0eb667c427560eb4b6407a99ae9ad4dc56f1ae943",
"wss://nproxy.kristapsk.lv",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"badf654d63cc56b51d20613c0c09ea3e460a31072ca5b8289375d86ffa907aeb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"390b5334739c171d82c84fe7c853462d7607537187f2a0695ede3b297a5b988c"
],
[
"p",
"e83b66a8ed2d37c07d1abea6e1b000a15549c69508fa4c5875556d52b0526c2b"
],
[
"p",
"32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
]
],
"content": "Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return data fields we should remove the filter from nodes.\nInstead I suggest we consider a consensus rule change (fork) to block miners from including large OP-return transactions.",
"sig": "9c60458151834ea30b02e3f15cf3ab88272d32d0b6306e8330afa927d40d8ea1b9f99931840fc70429d789251f6142595d5fb886ab2ceb9df5ed349a4d33c0e9"
}