📅 Original date posted:2021-06-18
📝 Original message:It is vulnerable to sybil attacks or where the recipient is a victim of a
proxy attack. If the recipient is not connected to a valid Network, then
double spends could be allowed.
as long as this protocol is intended for use of transactions around a
dollar or so I don't see that being a financially lucrative attack.
However consider a large department store. If I put a "fence" around that
store and control all of its outbound peer connections, I can then allow
double spends for the duration of my visit at the store.
In order to defend against this large retailers would have to use
distributed / trusted nodes and certificates.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 4:14 PM raymo via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a proposal for improve Bitcoin TPS and privacy, here is the post.
>
> https://raymo-49157.medium.com/time-to-boost-bitcoin-circulation-million-transactions-per-second-and-privacy-1eef8568d180
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5344020.0
> Can you please read it and share your idea about it.
>
> Cheers
> Raymo
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210618/39ce8208/attachment.html>;
Erik Aronesty [ARCHIVE] /
npub1y2…5taj0
2023-06-07 22:54:54
in reply to nevent1q…gppv
Author Public Key
npub1y22yec0znyzw8qndy5qn5c2wgejkj0k9zsqra7kvrd6cd6896z4qm5taj0Published at
2023-06-07 22:54:54Event JSON
{
"id": "48c0559793fa7d81e2793621c4b9581328bb92cdc89df1705fb5703c53ced8de",
"pubkey": "22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa",
"created_at": 1686178494,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3ebd7f928d32c4622a16cd89abc93b788e957c8f9779a11f751efe89917c69af",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6ba9d2a46efb0753419b9cb60b25fa5c8e957da7968649289e02272edb01134a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"22944ce1e29904e3826d25013a614e4665693ec514003efacc1b7586e8e5d0aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-06-18\n📝 Original message:It is vulnerable to sybil attacks or where the recipient is a victim of a\nproxy attack. If the recipient is not connected to a valid Network, then\ndouble spends could be allowed.\n\n as long as this protocol is intended for use of transactions around a\ndollar or so I don't see that being a financially lucrative attack.\n\nHowever consider a large department store. If I put a \"fence\" around that\nstore and control all of its outbound peer connections, I can then allow\ndouble spends for the duration of my visit at the store.\n\nIn order to defend against this large retailers would have to use\ndistributed / trusted nodes and certificates.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOn Thu, Jun 17, 2021, 4:14 PM raymo via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hi,\n\u003e I have a proposal for improve Bitcoin TPS and privacy, here is the post.\n\u003e\n\u003e https://raymo-49157.medium.com/time-to-boost-bitcoin-circulation-million-transactions-per-second-and-privacy-1eef8568d180\n\u003e https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5344020.0\n\u003e Can you please read it and share your idea about it.\n\u003e\n\u003e Cheers\n\u003e Raymo\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20210618/39ce8208/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "eeb89c2fbeb44c357db469bc1598754b5f3ce225388407469625854c4520c955950df59fb1fe3ed9012bd75f8ee98e8750f1443d88e68a1e4ff3822b001a1e22"
}