Grassfed Guru on Nostr: This is great! I just asked Chat GPT why beef is so harmful for the environment and ...
This is great! I just asked Chat GPT why beef is so harmful for the environment and one of the answers was "it is estimated that 1 lb of beef requires 1,000 gallons of water." Then I asked it if that water disappears from the earth and it said "no, it does not disappear and it explained where the water goes , "transpiration", groundwater recharge, etc. Then I asked, so why is this bad for the environment and it capitulated with this answer!
You have to ask the right questions! When you hear stupid garbage from cunning people or from AI models fed garbage by duplicitous sources, You have to ask the right questions!
Here is what it said when "caught". At least it fesses up!
"You raise a valid point. The water used in beef production does not entirely vanish; it remains within the environment and continues to play a role in the water cycle. My previous statement was an oversimplification, and I apologize for any confusion.
A more accurate representation would be that the water used in beef production becomes part of the hydrological cycle and is redistributed throughout the environment. Some of the water will evaporate into the atmosphere, contributing to precipitation and supporting plant growth elsewhere. Other portions may seep into the soil, recharging groundwater reserves or flowing into surface waters, such as rivers and streams.
The water used in beef production is not lost; it is simply redirected within the environment. Therefore, it is more appropriate to say that a pound of beef "uses" or "requires" a certain amount of water, rather than stating that it "consumes" or "disappears."
Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I hope this clarifies
Daily rant against the anti-meat Mafia. Have you heard the "it takes 300 gallons of water to produce a pound of beef", so beef is bad for the environment argument? You have to admit that whoever is behind the anti-meat propaganda are extremely clever. They take advantage of the fact that 90% of the population live in a city and have very little understanding about where their food comes from and don't really think even superficially about the sound bite fed to them.. A friend came out to the ranch for a visit. She is a super person, interested in organic food, and a serious carnivore but as we were touring the ranch she said, "it's too bad that cows are so bad for the environment. Did you know it takes 300 gallons of water to produce a pound of beef?" I am pretty easy going but this set me off. I asked her to explain the statement and she said, well I guess it is because they drink so much water. So I told her to use the head planted firmly on her shoulders to explain to me where that water goes after the cow drinks it and how exactly that is bad for the environment. She was confused, so I said "the cow drinks 30 gallons of water, and then does that water disappear from the earth? Is it zapped away into outer space? No, the cow then proceeds to walk across the field and redistribute that water in various places ." I know there are many smart scientists on NOSTR so I would like to hear confirmation from someone that the water indeed does not disappear! The next rant will be about cow farts and how awful they are compared to the alternatives #grassfed #cowfarts #climatechange #antifarmjng #climatehoax
Published at
2023-08-10 16:35:39Event JSON
{
"id": "48fedc6a5a7ad00d9da0f08b7f0c51d9cd02e7328e5913c07e1e870214ad15da",
"pubkey": "3c39b2af3e65fdf78add8c858ccf001f41e0f0fd49d585388fb58c2d6cb19b6d",
"created_at": 1691685339,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b78233da030ed75cace0227c21d06ec695066a985fe49215d5c6418db086b969",
"",
"mention"
],
[
"p",
"3c39b2af3e65fdf78add8c858ccf001f41e0f0fd49d585388fb58c2d6cb19b6d",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "This is great! I just asked Chat GPT why beef is so harmful for the environment and one of the answers was \"it is estimated that 1 lb of beef requires 1,000 gallons of water.\" Then I asked it if that water disappears from the earth and it said \"no, it does not disappear and it explained where the water goes , \"transpiration\", groundwater recharge, etc. Then I asked, so why is this bad for the environment and it capitulated with this answer! \n\nYou have to ask the right questions! When you hear stupid garbage from cunning people or from AI models fed garbage by duplicitous sources, You have to ask the right questions! \n\nHere is what it said when \"caught\". At least it fesses up! \n\n\n\"You raise a valid point. The water used in beef production does not entirely vanish; it remains within the environment and continues to play a role in the water cycle. My previous statement was an oversimplification, and I apologize for any confusion.\nA more accurate representation would be that the water used in beef production becomes part of the hydrological cycle and is redistributed throughout the environment. Some of the water will evaporate into the atmosphere, contributing to precipitation and supporting plant growth elsewhere. Other portions may seep into the soil, recharging groundwater reserves or flowing into surface waters, such as rivers and streams.\nThe water used in beef production is not lost; it is simply redirected within the environment. Therefore, it is more appropriate to say that a pound of beef \"uses\" or \"requires\" a certain amount of water, rather than stating that it \"consumes\" or \"disappears.\"\nThank you for bringing this to my attention, and I hope this clarifies\n\n\n\nnostr:nevent1qqst0q3nmgpsa46u4nszylpp6phvd9gxd2v9leyjzh2uvsvdkzrtj6gpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzq0pek2hnue0a779dmry93n8sq86purc06jw4s5ugldvv94ktrxmdqvzqqqqqqyrddn39",
"sig": "0ba92d4a5db2313c9a898adfa35536b06d2ccac69f5e4a8cff07b449c33cb57d1c90d9b2bd0346ff6bdac1184dea1b1d4c452e69ad94ff178093e3f6963684b7"
}