Sarah Fackrell on Nostr: "Currently, the [design patent] obviousness test provides a high degree of certainty ...
Published at
2023-07-05 17:10:19Event JSON
{
"id": "47a2714b0e2f46ce3a9f75c7859d47a93bcb1bedb959159b52c9e2fe89ebf810",
"pubkey": "9eefd04d32ab5da8de12d7b83201578ea095a676acf3a692ec1b0b202ae4e16f",
"created_at": 1688577019,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"designpatents"
],
[
"t",
"lkq"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/design_law/statuses/110662583527526297"
]
],
"content": "\"Currently, the [design patent] obviousness test provides a high degree of certainty for determining when a design is patentable.\"\n\nhttps://www.sternekessler.com/news-insights/client-alerts/federal-circuit-sit-en-banc-hear-lkq-v-gm-case-obviousness-design\n\nYes, a high degree of certainty that basically no § 103 challenges will succeed.\n\n#DesignPatents #LKQ",
"sig": "835b5a8914581983fcda9158b4f28dae724053c038ea4009f5166e9be4ceeb8eb6b42e2f303e0d2bdbe2eb2a66fef0f7124ae668cfdce306d23ba50d38fcf7e2"
}