Alex Kotenko [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-07-02 📝 Original message:Ok, agreed. I will submit ...

📅 Original date posted:2014-07-02
📝 Original message:Ok, agreed. I will submit a pull request to BIP72 then.
Not sure about escaping though. It is indeed not critical for bitcoin URIs,
but still it is a part of RFC, don't think we should go against it.

Andreas, we will implement this on our side, with bluetooth on r= and web
address on r1=.


2014-07-01 18:59 GMT+01:00 Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net>:

> Nope, r1/r2 sounds good to me. BTW we should update the spec to reflect
> that escaping is largely unnecessary in many cases.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140702/8da22f48/attachment.html>;