techriot on Nostr: @≠ ≠ ≠ wow, the entire publishing industry is compromised. Even MIT has sold ...

@≠ ≠ ≠ wow, the entire publishing industry is compromised. Even MIT has sold out to the point that nobody can tell the truth anymore, or give reasonable answers.  That was utterly frustrating, pointless to read and for what purpose? Since the writer had no clear answers or solutions, except perhaps, that when investigating LLM, one should start out small and observe closely. Isn't that the whole point of being a scientist, or have those skills been watered down too?  

I noticed, after rereading the article a few times, that the author, made it seem as if, every participant in AI and large language models, were totally oblivious, as to how any of their experiments worked, which is absurd on its face. However, I'm convinced, that the author has been cherry picking the data and only those instances cited, in the article, with those individuals mentioned, being the clueless wonders who have yet to discover their success are the only ones in LLM programming, known to be oblivious as to why, their methods work. The premise that AI programmers, universally, are just luckily stumbling into getting desired results smacks of fantasy, eluding to presumption, that these mere machines are suddenly, miraculously becoming sentient. Which would be a hoax. Life isn't created by clever computer programming, despite active imaginations. Creating life is going to take much more effort and even an inordinate amount of time.