📅 Original date posted:2014-08-30
📝 Original message:> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
>> It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not
>> on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is.
>
> Despite my complaining about github, I don't like the idea of moving
> somewhere else. The current way of working - to use github for storing
> the tree, and use a custom script for signing+merging - is fine with
> me.
>
> Github has a low barrier to contribution. Almost every open source
> developer already has a github account. Switching to something
> self-hosted makes it more difficult for people to contribute.
>
> Plus if we have to take the hosting upon ourselves, we have to handle
> sysadmin work ourselves as well. That's not a good use of the limited
> manpower available.
>
> Also it will be a lot of work to migrate over all the current issues
> and pulls. I don't look forward to that. I don't see the point of
> this, sorry.
>
> Wladimir
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
I agree with Wladimir, keep it simple. There being many other more urgent
questions to address, imho.
Odinn Cyberguerrilla [ARCHIVE] /
npub18x…hg6zk
2023-06-07 15:25:29
in reply to nevent1q…agdd
Author Public Key
npub18xqykhf26udeq2nyk98ee0a5q4w3s2f75m405a6zswpdy573lxeqmhg6zkSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:25:29Event JSON
{
"id": "661824642b271f6cd91f6a8ca200108b99a5a068389860a054f7190725cbadcc",
"pubkey": "39804b5d2ad71b902a64b14f9cbfb4055d18293ea6eafa77428382d253d1f9b2",
"created_at": 1686151529,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c005f45b1cb77392a2804d02a4c758eb9ca30d9af3fd9e762780478d5aeddb7a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e8bfa084394060624c8476a8d6f058d92797a1ac39027eb9537a0157f160cb3c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"de834b230daa8e6d04c44e51929c52dfdc36dc2f4105a0b67060d9dfc30d6ccc"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-08-30\n📝 Original message:\u003e On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e It would be nice if the issues and git repo for Bitcoin Core were not\n\u003e\u003e on such a centralized service as github, nice and convenient as it is.\n\u003e\n\u003e Despite my complaining about github, I don't like the idea of moving\n\u003e somewhere else. The current way of working - to use github for storing\n\u003e the tree, and use a custom script for signing+merging - is fine with\n\u003e me.\n\u003e\n\u003e Github has a low barrier to contribution. Almost every open source\n\u003e developer already has a github account. Switching to something\n\u003e self-hosted makes it more difficult for people to contribute.\n\u003e\n\u003e Plus if we have to take the hosting upon ourselves, we have to handle\n\u003e sysadmin work ourselves as well. That's not a good use of the limited\n\u003e manpower available.\n\u003e\n\u003e Also it will be a lot of work to migrate over all the current issues\n\u003e and pulls. I don't look forward to that. I don't see the point of\n\u003e this, sorry.\n\u003e\n\u003e Wladimir\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\nI agree with Wladimir, keep it simple. There being many other more urgent\nquestions to address, imho.",
"sig": "e3d11d6ab9b0dcf34b9f5608131687a2016595ca5fc525b9fc8d748374894564484f505b37f41b4ae0cd9cac8bede8729d7198a1c533846bf3fea4511d821741"
}