Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-17 📝 Original message:On Friday, January 17, ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-01-17
📝 Original message:On Friday, January 17, 2014 8:53:47 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> <vendor hat: on> BitPay sure would like to see CPFP in upstream.
>
> I think the main hurdle to merging was that various people disagreed
> on various edge case handling and implementation details, but no
> fundamental objections.
Heck, even I disagree with implementation details, but it's still better than
nothing. We can always merge major reorganisations/reimplementations later
when they're written: merging this one doesn't mean we're stuck with it
forever...
Luke
Published at
2023-06-07 15:12:16Event JSON
{
"id": "681ae10d4663f546746c5e681d2319bdad4627357306e154d99996f6330598e6",
"pubkey": "6ac6a519b554d8ff726a301e3daec0b489f443793778feccc6ea7a536f7354f1",
"created_at": 1686150736,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2554c52a67cb4c628dbda8a8971cb49eac1625e5569c8f7b46b77f379d8a9cce",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"6f1c45c666bd6e6dd8b8ae48c1e66dc43e724ed0af7863e2176eaae3d35f4bc0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"131b929bd24fea3b51a119fe477e84f8bdc25398d7b881798bf8339d8bf2656b"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-17\n📝 Original message:On Friday, January 17, 2014 8:53:47 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:\n\u003e \u003cvendor hat: on\u003e BitPay sure would like to see CPFP in upstream.\n\u003e \n\u003e I think the main hurdle to merging was that various people disagreed\n\u003e on various edge case handling and implementation details, but no\n\u003e fundamental objections.\n\nHeck, even I disagree with implementation details, but it's still better than \nnothing. We can always merge major reorganisations/reimplementations later \nwhen they're written: merging this one doesn't mean we're stuck with it \nforever...\n\nLuke",
"sig": "053dde5ac040997984d79b57c67d64e94545b714625bc70734a68bd8dddf740328f44a8df8533529c85b5e21d1901ab4a6e2c889cefbb14783df6d895ddab52c"
}