I also think the idea is that if one or more relays are compromised that you are connected to others.
I think nostr users should utilize multiple relays for redundancy of events and assume that a relay will lose or delete posts (data loss, censorship, etc).
The difference here is authorities would have to do some actual work here and wouldn’t be able to capture one entity to compromise the whole protocol.
Just my 2 sats.
wolfbearclaw / Counter Narrative
npub1pw…8pf5t
2023-01-08 23:59:16
in reply to nevent1q…ka76
Author Public Key
npub1pwtrrydty95q5ces0tkm2r7hkqfe9jwxhmmee5xwke6g4lz70l7sd8pf5tPublished at
2023-01-08 23:59:16Event JSON
{
"id": "61f131dfcf50d2208f2c2c955fe8ef7c858c25ce1a6016b280c3be32f9f0b3e7",
"pubkey": "0b963191ab21680a63307aedb50fd7b01392c9c6bef79cd0ceb6748afc5e7ffd",
"created_at": 1673222356,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"639fbf4069ced3f6e4047c148c2ff5d2724e6cfcf1379f0dcf51ae1a52863cfb"
],
[
"e",
"f15c2b39a0cccb892b5cf98883cc509400bff193ce847e6b1e9133440b4d6813"
],
[
"p",
"fca142a3a900fed71d831aa0aa9c21bb86a5917a9e1183659857b684f25ae1ce"
]
],
"content": "I also think the idea is that if one or more relays are compromised that you are connected to others. \n\nI think nostr users should utilize multiple relays for redundancy of events and assume that a relay will lose or delete posts (data loss, censorship, etc). \n\nThe difference here is authorities would have to do some actual work here and wouldn’t be able to capture one entity to compromise the whole protocol. \n\nJust my 2 sats.",
"sig": "f0bd55951207afa0c275c04338b8ddbbe74736ca4817b68eff1d1ff3c8890d61c1b293178d7247ed91045e874e4d117e71e5d1b7bb42253b355eca6770453f23"
}