📅 Original date posted:2015-08-04
📝 Original message:>For those wishing to do actual research, esp. people such as profs mentoring students, ...
>But keep in mind that you're wading into a highly politically charged research field
>with billions hanging on the blocksize limit; understand that people aren't happy when
>flawed papers end up on reddit being used to promote bad ideas. You'd be wise to run future
>work past experts in the field prior to publishing widely if you dislike heated controversy.
> Or, I could just point out the obvious rather than try to be polite: you know exactly why
>the above makes no sense as a reply to this thread and are deliberately lying.
>If the situation is the latter, your conduct is toxic to the development mailing list
>discussion, not to mention a waste of all our time, and you should leave.
Researchers should also keep in mind that some of developers are
immature and have limited knowledge or experience beyond their Bitcoin
expertise ("Idiot-savants"). Others want to be in "charge" of
drama-laced posts on reddit and they get upset if others do the same
things.
In any case these rants and attacks by Todd and Garzik should be posted
on their personal blogs or reddit instead of this list.
Russ
Milly Bitcoin [ARCHIVE] /
npub1rv…hc5wt
2023-06-07 17:32:48
in reply to nevent1q…scrg
Author Public Key
npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wtSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 17:32:48Event JSON
{
"id": "6019448506586a448a8c2239c2fcaa8f911edcec813de70236639defead306ff",
"pubkey": "1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50",
"created_at": 1686159168,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2da2e00d8e383de13f6ee6d9d66f9da48994b834188a0ae47ea0319febd85ff5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0aadfd7b295b905a84ecfd2960324857cf44e7977d5e60f4c8f34cbc27f41a71",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-04\n📝 Original message:\u003eFor those wishing to do actual research, esp. people such as profs mentoring students, ...\n\n\u003eBut keep in mind that you're wading into a highly politically charged research field\n\u003ewith billions hanging on the blocksize limit; understand that people aren't happy when\n\u003eflawed papers end up on reddit being used to promote bad ideas. You'd be wise to run future\n\u003ework past experts in the field prior to publishing widely if you dislike heated controversy.\n\n\u003e Or, I could just point out the obvious rather than try to be polite: you know exactly why\n\u003ethe above makes no sense as a reply to this thread and are deliberately lying.\n\n\u003eIf the situation is the latter, your conduct is toxic to the development mailing list\n\u003ediscussion, not to mention a waste of all our time, and you should leave.\n\n\n\n\nResearchers should also keep in mind that some of developers are \nimmature and have limited knowledge or experience beyond their Bitcoin \nexpertise (\"Idiot-savants\"). Others want to be in \"charge\" of \ndrama-laced posts on reddit and they get upset if others do the same \nthings.\n\nIn any case these rants and attacks by Todd and Garzik should be posted \non their personal blogs or reddit instead of this list.\n\nRuss",
"sig": "ce7ad57b8950e75a37e563882d847047e8ff748bb6aa9ea1456161eb42c638317c9742d05d0121492f6fe53eb45474e5ead25d09b5c386873a0959a20e714d4d"
}