📅 Original date posted:2015-08-16
📝 Original message:Hi Adam,
I welcomed XT for its declared focus on usability with current means.
I think there is also more room for non-consenus relevant P2P protocol flavors than a single code base can accommodate.
XT is also as Jeff just tweeted a relief valve.
It became important, that Bitcoin is able to evolve even if there are conflicting educated opinions.
If a review process serves decision making, then I’d be glad to participate.
Tamas Blummer
> On Aug 16, 2015, at 19:01, Adam Back <adam at cypherspace.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tamas
>
> Do you find BIP 101, BIP 102, BIP 103 and the flexcap proposal
> deserving of equal consideration? Just curious because of your post.
>
> Will you be interested to participate in the BIP review process and
> perhaps attend the workshop on Bitcoin scaling announced here
> recently?
>
> Adam
>
> On 16 August 2015 at 17:07, Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Being a bitcoin software developer an entrepreneur for years I learned that success is not a direct consequence of technology and is not inevitable.
>> BitcoinXT manifesto (https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt#the-xt-manifesto) should resonate with many fellow entrepreneurs.
>> I applaud Mike and Gavin for creating that choice for us.
>>
>> Tamas Blummer
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150816/946692ad/attachment.html>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150816/946692ad/attachment.sig>;
Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] /
npub1cc…ex8m8
2023-06-07 17:35:26
in reply to nevent1q…pjhf
Author Public Key
npub1ccegg9n9lnx6huppxg43m95488yur7pfemkn3pz0agjws5ffvtts0ex8m8Published at
2023-06-07 17:35:26Event JSON
{
"id": "6000343d08c37b510401cdd45b9d87fdca995be9280f4531772bf3e24bd3bfa2",
"pubkey": "c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7",
"created_at": 1686159326,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c8deaa0aeee1e5d915e04ef7baf8b8074172a310b656820cd8767442ca514e56",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"df35ba6519493c0fdf8287162d0543d4ad9fa4d022cabd302bc04d61c184262f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ee0fa66772f633411e4432e251cfb15b1c0fe8cd8befd8b0d86eb302402a8b4a"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-16\n📝 Original message:Hi Adam,\n\nI welcomed XT for its declared focus on usability with current means.\nI think there is also more room for non-consenus relevant P2P protocol flavors than a single code base can accommodate.\nXT is also as Jeff just tweeted a relief valve.\n\nIt became important, that Bitcoin is able to evolve even if there are conflicting educated opinions.\nIf a review process serves decision making, then I’d be glad to participate.\n\nTamas Blummer\n\n\u003e On Aug 16, 2015, at 19:01, Adam Back \u003cadam at cypherspace.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \n\u003e Hi Tamas\n\u003e \n\u003e Do you find BIP 101, BIP 102, BIP 103 and the flexcap proposal\n\u003e deserving of equal consideration? Just curious because of your post.\n\u003e \n\u003e Will you be interested to participate in the BIP review process and\n\u003e perhaps attend the workshop on Bitcoin scaling announced here\n\u003e recently?\n\u003e \n\u003e Adam\n\u003e \n\u003e On 16 August 2015 at 17:07, Tamas Blummer via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Being a bitcoin software developer an entrepreneur for years I learned that success is not a direct consequence of technology and is not inevitable.\n\u003e\u003e BitcoinXT manifesto (https://github.com/bitcoinxt/bitcoinxt#the-xt-manifesto) should resonate with many fellow entrepreneurs.\n\u003e\u003e I applaud Mike and Gavin for creating that choice for us.\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Tamas Blummer\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e \n\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150816/946692ad/attachment.html\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150816/946692ad/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "86589eb9ba408a9e2d22bb19aaff4f8052c582ef6db500b86954b18b84cb4810054d7e1f321a07549384324fcb4ef37b98f4cbb54789655a1fd42b455908037e"
}