📅 Original date posted:2013-02-13
📝 Original message:On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Since, in the long run,
>> Bitcoin can't meet its security and decenteralization promises without
>> blockspace scarcity to drive non-trivial fees and without scaling
>> limits to keep it decenteralized— it's not a change that could be made
>> more lightly than changing the supply of coin.
> I disagree with Gregory on this. I believe that Bitcoin CAN meet its
> security and decentralization promises without any hard limit on block size.
>
> I had a fruitful discussion about this with an economist friend this
> weekend, and I'll eventually getting around to writing up why I believe
> raising the block size limit will not be a problem.
That would be fantastic.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 11:32:21
in reply to nevent1q…a2ua
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 11:32:21Event JSON
{
"id": "60e415e554c572e3a8e922b04e1605aa9b3bdebd8f6a922e2d7165d821ed1681",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686137541,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2e561ad47e92fd0bdf1706fe9a8ca4496d0e4a334280ca5b47233a968945935f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2dfc8aff66587c4d0ed2ad367779f7bfb6b0c09d01aafa6c0fb04358384e8b27",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-02-13\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Gavin Andresen \u003cgavinandresen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e\n\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Since, in the long run,\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin can't meet its security and decenteralization promises without\n\u003e\u003e blockspace scarcity to drive non-trivial fees and without scaling\n\u003e\u003e limits to keep it decenteralized— it's not a change that could be made\n\u003e\u003e more lightly than changing the supply of coin.\n\u003e I disagree with Gregory on this. I believe that Bitcoin CAN meet its\n\u003e security and decentralization promises without any hard limit on block size.\n\u003e\n\u003e I had a fruitful discussion about this with an economist friend this\n\u003e weekend, and I'll eventually getting around to writing up why I believe\n\u003e raising the block size limit will not be a problem.\n\nThat would be fantastic.",
"sig": "b2d879f0f11ccbf0b8d52c8a93ea039af5c59dd5ab6704384e563b477c3978a97086a1dabaf40b4fd42e57da8432e4394157f2c30c9fde7645cb1b4e016edbae"
}