📅 Original date posted:2017-08-30
📝 Original message:> This will lead to old UTXOs not being recognized by NEW wallets, because
> at some point new wallets will not care about implementing old standards.
Your observations make perfect sense. That's exactly why we endorse
option b. in my previous email.
> The only way to address this is to get out of bip39 and bip43, and to
> include a version number in the mnemonic seed.
As for the idea of having a versioning on mnemonic seeds, I believe it
would be a very useful feature indeed. How about opening a new,
separate, topic about it?
On 30/08/17 12:07, Thomas Voegtlin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> On 29.08.2017 12:19, Simone Bronzini via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>> 2. SegWit addresses:
>> since mixing SegWit and non-SegWit addresses on the same BIP44 structure
>> could lead to UTXOs not being completely recognised by old wallets,
>> BIP49 was proposed to separate the key space.
> This will lead to old UTXOs not being recognized by NEW wallets, because
> at some point new wallets will not care about implementing old standards.
>
> The only way to address this is to get out of bip39 and bip43, and to
> include a version number in the mnemonic seed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0xB2E60C73.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 15541 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170830/91b5db27/attachment.bin>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 898 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170830/91b5db27/attachment.sig>;
Simone Bronzini [ARCHIVE] /
npub1eu…6244x
2023-06-07 18:05:10
in reply to nevent1q…32wa
Author Public Key
npub1eutgkshv9qrfk005wypygy20svrhkz0f8sjnxp95pjm8y7ptxv4q96244xSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 18:05:10Event JSON
{
"id": "69a10025d3490a445a4be6f59ad3da5fcb31bf43a8a83b2edd2fb64f7a86aea0",
"pubkey": "cf168b42ec28069b3df4710244114f83077b09e93c253304b40cb672782b332a",
"created_at": 1686161110,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"4226676d217d0209465f4780759621ecdc1ce1537848685bc3d2fa36d82f3e9f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d1146ce54bc81e4a59dc2494a563f066f357b57e3efae460b06c49a3f5f0366d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7a4ba40070e54012212867182c66beef592603fe7c7284b72ffaafce9da20c05"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2017-08-30\n📝 Original message:\u003e This will lead to old UTXOs not being recognized by NEW wallets, because\n\u003e at some point new wallets will not care about implementing old standards.\n\nYour observations make perfect sense. That's exactly why we endorse\noption b. in my previous email.\n\n\u003e The only way to address this is to get out of bip39 and bip43, and to\n\u003e include a version number in the mnemonic seed.\n\nAs for the idea of having a versioning on mnemonic seeds, I believe it\nwould be a very useful feature indeed. How about opening a new,\nseparate, topic about it?\n\n\nOn 30/08/17 12:07, Thomas Voegtlin via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e On 29.08.2017 12:19, Simone Bronzini via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e 2. SegWit addresses:\n\u003e\u003e since mixing SegWit and non-SegWit addresses on the same BIP44 structure\n\u003e\u003e could lead to UTXOs not being completely recognised by old wallets,\n\u003e\u003e BIP49 was proposed to separate the key space. \n\u003e This will lead to old UTXOs not being recognized by NEW wallets, because\n\u003e at some point new wallets will not care about implementing old standards.\n\u003e\n\u003e The only way to address this is to get out of bip39 and bip43, and to\n\u003e include a version number in the mnemonic seed.\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: 0xB2E60C73.asc\nType: application/pgp-keys\nSize: 15541 bytes\nDesc: not available\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170830/91b5db27/attachment.bin\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 898 bytes\nDesc: OpenPGP digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170830/91b5db27/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "7a2922be125afc8df4d915f7dbd96045a0633a0b03d1cd1a98efe4d77af6b56692db3aab2428ed82d1eda7e1e1c133e9683747b1ba3ce69546333144b1a7765e"
}