📅 Original date posted:2022-04-25
📝 Original message:On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:36, ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> wrote
CTV *can* benefit layer 2 users, which is why I switched from vaguely
> apathetic to CTV, to vaguely supportive of it.
Other proposals exist that also benefit L2 solutions. What makes you
support CTV specifically?
Centrally documenting the implications of each side by side and point by
point might be a useful next step. This would enable a larger part of the
community to understand each proposal and may reduce repetition and
misunderstandings on this list.
Once a common understanding of the implications of each proposal is in
place, their tradeoffs can be considered, facilitating creating consensus
on which proposal benefits a maximum of users.
Zac
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220425/8855a181/attachment-0001.html>;
Zac Greenwood [ARCHIVE] /
npub1gy…dvff7
2023-06-07 23:07:52
in reply to nevent1q…9r2s
Author Public Key
npub1gymmksd9tgwzc5w33umlx08sc2ggys3v2cucmpvl7yy9720wh49s8dvff7Published at
2023-06-07 23:07:52Event JSON
{
"id": "6d91cf166e5d82bab66c44c27960acafa304ae4e6cbafcc88b3037c49a9578d3",
"pubkey": "4137bb41a55a1c2c51d18f37f33cf0c29082422c56398d859ff1085f29eebd4b",
"created_at": 1686179272,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2ad3d3403e1d63b96ae96eb1c1f2ba31d1c1dccbc5720a099543ffc26240da8b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a8c2e1d611a2415fa90f659e8cd86d7ae265938cc139f1567433b5edafa021eb",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-04-25\n📝 Original message:On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 at 07:36, ZmnSCPxj \u003cZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com\u003e wrote\n\nCTV *can* benefit layer 2 users, which is why I switched from vaguely\n\u003e apathetic to CTV, to vaguely supportive of it.\n\n\nOther proposals exist that also benefit L2 solutions. What makes you\nsupport CTV specifically?\n\nCentrally documenting the implications of each side by side and point by\npoint might be a useful next step. This would enable a larger part of the\ncommunity to understand each proposal and may reduce repetition and\nmisunderstandings on this list.\n\nOnce a common understanding of the implications of each proposal is in\nplace, their tradeoffs can be considered, facilitating creating consensus\non which proposal benefits a maximum of users.\n\nZac\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20220425/8855a181/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "fc355319ca7ee896677a2a6278100088985151d467d436146e7186631eb63d7bbd4d0057ccbace501df7b0914c64d4c9fde4ee9023c0a534d0be99c84a143723"
}