Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2011-08-10 🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer is ...
📅 Original date posted:2011-08-10
🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer is discouraged from joining a project due to the rejection of proposed changes. The project needs more testers and bug fixers.
📝 Original message:> To be honest I feel a bit like every change that I (and I've also heard this
> from others) propose is shot down, no matter how well formulated. This is
> actively discouraging developers from joining this project.
Well, to be honest I don't think more developers adding new features
are needed right now-- I think the project's critical needs are more
people testing and helping to fix bugs and scalability issues.
In this particular case, I said I was mildly against it-- if you want
me to switch to supporting it, then reassure me you're willing to do
ALL the work to make it happen. Send me a list of wiki pages you'll
edit to document the change and tell me that you'll be around to help
people rewrite their backup scripts.
> I think it would be better to switch to two branches, like most other open
> source projects I've worked with.
I don't see how dividing efforts between a 'bug fix' and 'development'
branch will help fix the project's critical needs. If we did, I think
there would be less pressure to help with the boring bug-fixing and
testing of the bug-fix branch, which I think would be bad.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
Published at
2023-06-07 02:14:03Event JSON
{
"id": "6da19ba1206f772f903b559b666e4599b741373e3a1227c96fbb8e74c6bec19d",
"pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4",
"created_at": 1686104043,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fe8ae56772ad6135ef8f3cc5e223de1011f21616a51d5302085d2b9ebf339345",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"7bc3333f706cae7c22ff7a21ec85ff2a83d986100ccdd2cd8592b16c17af116d",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd7fc091d5673974c36bf2b5c6e8b4a5079d6821b95f6719fd48571aeb25b785"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2011-08-10\n🗒️ Summary of this message: A developer is discouraged from joining a project due to the rejection of proposed changes. The project needs more testers and bug fixers.\n📝 Original message:\u003e To be honest I feel a bit like every change that I (and I've also heard this\n\u003e from others) propose is shot down, no matter how well formulated. This is\n\u003e actively discouraging developers from joining this project.\n\nWell, to be honest I don't think more developers adding new features\nare needed right now-- I think the project's critical needs are more\npeople testing and helping to fix bugs and scalability issues.\n\nIn this particular case, I said I was mildly against it-- if you want\nme to switch to supporting it, then reassure me you're willing to do\nALL the work to make it happen. Send me a list of wiki pages you'll\nedit to document the change and tell me that you'll be around to help\npeople rewrite their backup scripts.\n\n\u003e I think it would be better to switch to two branches, like most other open\n\u003e source projects I've worked with.\n\nI don't see how dividing efforts between a 'bug fix' and 'development'\nbranch will help fix the project's critical needs. If we did, I think\nthere would be less pressure to help with the boring bug-fixing and\ntesting of the bug-fix branch, which I think would be bad.\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen",
"sig": "1cb654ad6d7a85a96762402f2ad503253c9eecbb5fe50538a842fcf9ac15b5179e615307018e3db41fcd8fafd40787666f2fc7eb986a8877a344f839160f6c5b"
}