Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-11-26 📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-11-26
📝 Original message:On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:32:58PM -0800, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> After a little more though (and some comments from aj), I realize that the opcode naming convention is actually CHECK <condition > VERIFY.
>
> Therefore, the full opcode name should be CHECKRELATIVELOCKTIMEVERIFY.
>
> However, this name is ridiculously long, so at least some part will require abbreviation.
>
> In typical script example usage, most sensible seems to be to abbreviate both CLTV and CRLTV.

...and CRLTV is hard to visually distinguish from CLTV. :(

You know, calling it AGEVERIFY is short and sweet.

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000ef246c814f8cb8c1a26bc3c6cb1286bdbc5f4140ed3fc79
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151126/47f980c2/attachment.sig>;