📅 Original date posted:2015-12-29
📝 Original message:That sounds like a rather unlikely scenario. Unless you have a specific reason to suspect that might be the case, I think we don't need to worry about it too much. If we announce the intention to perform such a soft fork a couple of months before the soft fork becomes active, and if nobody complains about it destroying their secret stash, then I think that's fair enough and we could proceed.
On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:47 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Do we need to consider that someone may have a timelocked big tx, with private key lost?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151229/11fa10ce/attachment.sig>;
Jonathan Toomim [ARCHIVE] /
npub1pl…yj0hj
2023-06-07 17:47:22
in reply to nevent1q…em39
Author Public Key
npub1pl6kcz00s7wgn6syh73dta0qm9sqpmtw4adv8rnm2w9fmynkw45sayj0hjPublished at
2023-06-07 17:47:22Event JSON
{
"id": "6b32000177baa4b9d161b16c88341844500e4c0d7373fa2ffdca86cd54883438",
"pubkey": "0ff56c09ef879c89ea04bfa2d5f5e0d96000ed6eaf5ac38e7b538a9d92767569",
"created_at": 1686160042,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0600edb122b23d28de1adba7ca47e2347d6be937da11235e57408ba908190104",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"af33b86d5a566c2006286c19ddf9f53ce55b59f92de44797c7ade859f18478b0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ab1c85bd5ad443631a95b228bd1630bf7acdb27f6de01a960ccfbb077831d7ec"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-12-29\n📝 Original message:That sounds like a rather unlikely scenario. Unless you have a specific reason to suspect that might be the case, I think we don't need to worry about it too much. If we announce the intention to perform such a soft fork a couple of months before the soft fork becomes active, and if nobody complains about it destroying their secret stash, then I think that's fair enough and we could proceed.\n\nOn Dec 28, 2015, at 11:47 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Do we need to consider that someone may have a timelocked big tx, with private key lost?\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 496 bytes\nDesc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151229/11fa10ce/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "d441e78908168abb846f63560f333167dd8184d388c4e6c3a52342e867e8b0065b3bee753a46af2381fa3eaba1db689e6e2508ddcdc35abea5fa26e504541795"
}