📅 Original date posted:2015-02-19
📝 Original message:On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas at bitsofproof.com>
wrote:
> I launched a Lighthouse project to add Java Language Binding to lib
> consensus. Let's turn the debate to a constructive vote.
First, I strongly disagree with voting here for reasons that I hope others
will elaborate on. Second, I think that squeezing all possible language
bindings into a project is also unproductive. What is it that the webkit
people did for this? I think they had gobject bindings, and then all of the
languages have their own gobject bridge to take advantage of that.
Naturally the downside here is that gobject means you have a gtk
dependency. A similar solution would be interesting and worth exploring,
though, especially if something similar without gtk exists.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150219/34fa6208/attachment.html>;
Bryan Bishop [ARCHIVE] /
npub1vt…jsjpg
2023-06-07 15:30:37
in reply to nevent1q…3vw8
Author Public Key
npub1vtwuk4rjyj6zrq3tv2z9lvdm6a7g8zujf0gz9q2vljlztdaqw36sjjsjpgPublished at
2023-06-07 15:30:37Event JSON
{
"id": "691fa003bad47e7bf7d4d4d12bcce0bf1e5f4de67f914458c196050f2e5b2156",
"pubkey": "62ddcb547224b421822b62845fb1bbd77c838b924bd022814cfcbe25b7a07475",
"created_at": 1686151837,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"a1e27a9e8f5d88bf32b6a112984bbe10158121e645475e7be21e08ccaa36e778",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"3de41a6c58334bf07d6897b823ce8843a8f1a8c28a122efc9c3f212063935e9a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-19\n📝 Original message:On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Tamas Blummer \u003ctamas at bitsofproof.com\u003e\nwrote:\n\n\u003e I launched a Lighthouse project to add Java Language Binding to lib\n\u003e consensus. Let's turn the debate to a constructive vote.\n\n\nFirst, I strongly disagree with voting here for reasons that I hope others\nwill elaborate on. Second, I think that squeezing all possible language\nbindings into a project is also unproductive. What is it that the webkit\npeople did for this? I think they had gobject bindings, and then all of the\nlanguages have their own gobject bridge to take advantage of that.\nNaturally the downside here is that gobject means you have a gtk\ndependency. A similar solution would be interesting and worth exploring,\nthough, especially if something similar without gtk exists.\n\n- Bryan\nhttp://heybryan.org/\n1 512 203 0507\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150219/34fa6208/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "2b640c155debf77d2a60efe94db2406b2cfcf291526961a1b055035e13ee11ab275a66b8e71794149fee4f3b458ea804398d6fd0e0291b93577dacc02b157399"
}