Tom Harding [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2016-09-02 📝 Original message:On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2016-09-02
📝 Original message:On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1.
>
This fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together?
Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently?
Published at
2023-06-07 17:53:15Event JSON
{
"id": "648e9e5d0c5c110fe5a97cac8fb98ad6916a179b6806b088fdd9b47b3fd3b5e1",
"pubkey": "dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3",
"created_at": 1686160395,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"43df2881438b8e0c92be94e6f0b276e99c79262573fb14879a6dbb2924b0046b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0fc41ec469dd0cbd0bf62515efa4a423caee73da59e5aa0129eb43a75f60191e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2016-09-02\n📝 Original message:On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e This BIP will be deployed by \"version bits\" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name \"segwit\" and using bit 1.\n\u003e\n\nThis fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together? \nShouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently?",
"sig": "444274aa573a43223f6398f2b3bb2867ee277d2c67b64bde1cf39e697821ab6eff32303156cf9a993b78654f4c78cedbf635bc19d34eca8748621872d9316662"
}