James Grimmelmann on Nostr: This CPSC decision that Amazon must take responsibility for recalling dangerous ...
Published at
2024-07-31 02:52:35Event JSON
{
"id": "6485ccc860dc232a486a50b0934c09ea5f5f3c2ff9d89e968a5cc5b24ab8e13f",
"pubkey": "38d50a9743e712e262dd92352b0027538bd59fa3225a826a1b20ba6aa4e319f1",
"created_at": 1722394355,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@jtlg/112878836456571590",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/jtlg/statuses/112878836456571590",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/users/jtlg/statuses/112878836456571590",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "This CPSC decision that Amazon must take responsibility for recalling dangerous products it sells through Fulfillment by Amazon:\n\n(1) Is completely reasonable.\n(2) Features some shocking arguments from Amazon to the contrary.\n(3) Is a good example of the kind of everyday administrative law that is at risk from the current Supreme Court.\n\nhttps://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/pdfs/recall/lawsuits/abc/142%20-%20In%20the%20Matter%20of%20Amazon.com%20Inc.%20Decision%20and%20Order.pdf?",
"sig": "9f9176e6b9f8242a769148f8b91b7aa5861f0c882355eb86d934dc9319a615f8f84cb7fea883e8b423174cc30c6e7c187c78fbb9698326e161814319baa1c8bf"
}