Question ... why do you need a "pet bond"? Isn't the whole point of regular "bond" is that it covers any reasonable damage that might occur? Is regular "bond" then in this arrangement just "human bond"? Should they then double "human bond" if your partner moves in?
Shouldn't "bond" just be "bond"?
(leaving aside the point that if you are specifying that landlords can still deny you pets anyway then it's not really changing much substantially about current rental inadequacies)
Dr Sarah Hendrica Bickerton /
npub1w0…hsxcg
2024-04-15 04:22:44
Author Public Key
npub1w0vaqkqjy0ru6yncqu36a9aks8d5st59alc327nqs602d06gm3mqrhsxcgPublished at
2024-04-15 04:22:44Event JSON
{
"id": "64e994c5106dbbfe6a58b2ba36437d29c42daa68d9d8d6cd086a2ed2abbe37c8",
"pubkey": "73d9d0581223c7cd12780723ae97b681db482e85eff1157a60869ea6bf48dc76",
"created_at": 1713154964,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.nz/users/sarahhbickerton/statuses/112273323728794063",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Question ... why do you need a \"pet bond\"? Isn't the whole point of regular \"bond\" is that it covers any reasonable damage that might occur? Is regular \"bond\" then in this arrangement just \"human bond\"? Should they then double \"human bond\" if your partner moves in?\n\nShouldn't \"bond\" just be \"bond\"?\n\n(leaving aside the point that if you are specifying that landlords can still deny you pets anyway then it's not really changing much substantially about current rental inadequacies)",
"sig": "8767a87b201ba340ae3c09ad1e1235dfcbee8f5d1868e7455f35c596585d0d8bd8d88e6c26064685aa54f1f0e4b2d8d737802d29ac244e62f5b0c39af2996723"
}