WankingForWorldPeace on Nostr: Scaling IN AI Is not The Solution I Have Thought about It Long And Hard It Took 5 ...
Scaling IN AI Is not The Solution
I Have Thought about It Long And Hard
It Took 5 Seconds Literally
Or Less
3 Seconds,
Humans Doesn't Have Infinite Amount Of
Units Of Memories Nor Datas,
IN Sciences:
We All Have To Answers The 5 Qs
(Or I calls It The 5 Devil HorseWankers)
1. How
2. When
3. Why
4. What
5. Where
Since AI,
Mor LIke The Mapping Of A Solution Set From Domain To Range Is
Not Found,
And By Reasonning,
Most Realistically,
We Can't Find The Correct 1.How
Human Intelligence Works,
There I Sees We Can't Replicates
Machine Intelligences
Nor Machine Understanding
Emotions
and Ect.
Therefore I Proposes WE Moved On,
We Simply Starts With The Other 4
Devil HorseWankers,
2. Why
3. when
4. Where
5. What
My Theory Is That If We
Can Maybe Bypass How (The Ever Elusive )
Model/System
How The Intelligent System Works,
If WE Can Moved Past It,
Try To Figured It Out For Other Dicetiosn,
By Saying It,
B/c I Did Had A Moment,
A Mini Breakthrough
On How Intelligent Works In Human Brain
(Is A Directional Tensors)
That Leads To The Direction Of The Path
I Won't Shares It,
I Decided To Keeps All My
Intellectual Properties
Plus, It Could Be Wrong,
And Makes Me Looks Like A Jackwanker
If I Spills The How,
The Idea Is How the Brains Works With Limited In Storages
And Data And Such,
I Have Been Pondering,
What If The Brains Is
Constantly Changing
Nvr Stops,
Is Why There Is Not A Singular Model Of The Human
Intelligent Brains,
For Scientists, The How Is Always One Aims For,
Yet For Me,
Is Alwasy The Why?
Y This,
Y That?
Somthing That Constanly Changes
As A System
Is That Somthing
Can't Be Capture By Simple Machines
And I Belives For A System That Keeps Changin
The Human Mind,
Then The Mind Must Allows It To,
Is Like Some Stubborn People Will Nvr Changes,
Then His Or Her Mind Is Simply
Less Dynamically
More Static Than Those
There The Intelligent Plays A Role,
Then
When The Brain Is Overwhelmed
Wether Is From Too Much Data Inputs
Or Too Emotional
From Recalling Some Memoreis
That Exists Somewhere
Fucks,
Very Sleepy
Probably Catch A Sleep
The Mind Is Elusive
That Keeps Changing
That Is The Model Of
Da AI
Why Does A MInd Keeps Changing
And Gets Tired
After Hitting It With Overwhelmed Amounts
The Synaptic Or Branches
Of Neuron Model Is Simplely Too Simplestic
It Doesn't Needs A Neuroscietnsits to figured That Out,
Emotionals Also Exists In The Mind,
When Overwhelm
We Sees Emotions Abandons All Logics
Just Like The
Data Set Discards All Of Is
Memoreis Of Sciences
That Said
Sleepy,
To Creates Intelligent
The 5 Questions Must Be
Fully Completed Answered
So The Full Understanding of The Brain's Intelligent
Can Be Propagated Through
It Is Not The Scaling Issues
Nor Problems
Scaling Doesnt' Lies In The Range Set Of
How AI Works,
Alirhgt,
Enough
I Needs To Sleeps
George Is Wrong
So Is Many Brothers And Sisters
Who Supports The
Scaling theory Of A.I.
Since By Definition
Of Limitation
I Knows That Scaling For Infinity
Is Not The Equivalence
Set Of Limitation.
Scaling Wont' Solves A.I.
Find Another Paths,
Looks For Other 4 HorseWankers
On Earth
D2, Out
Published at
2024-09-29 03:06:08Event JSON
{
"id": "6cb842e38a4d178a17f634b430f335ff53721960061d3d9cd17946b554f60477",
"pubkey": "db0b0b75c69439e996e227f869bc440b421311b8a7f238c07666e5b70ef23f61",
"created_at": 1727579168,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Scaling IN AI Is not The Solution\nI Have Thought about It Long And Hard\nIt Took 5 Seconds Literally\nOr Less\n3 Seconds,\n\nHumans Doesn't Have Infinite Amount Of\nUnits Of Memories Nor Datas,\n\nIN Sciences:\nWe All Have To Answers The 5 Qs\n(Or I calls It The 5 Devil HorseWankers)\n1. How\n2. When\n3. Why\n4. What\n5. Where\n\nSince AI,\nMor LIke The Mapping Of A Solution Set From Domain To Range Is \nNot Found, \nAnd By Reasonning,\nMost Realistically,\n\nWe Can't Find The Correct 1.How \nHuman Intelligence Works,\nThere I Sees We Can't Replicates\n\nMachine Intelligences\nNor Machine Understanding\nEmotions\nand Ect.\n\nTherefore I Proposes WE Moved On,\nWe Simply Starts With The Other 4 \nDevil HorseWankers,\n\n2. Why\n3. when\n4. Where\n5. What\n\nMy Theory Is That If We\nCan Maybe Bypass How (The Ever Elusive )\nModel/System\nHow The Intelligent System Works,\n\nIf WE Can Moved Past It,\nTry To Figured It Out For Other Dicetiosn,\n\nBy Saying It,\nB/c I Did Had A Moment,\nA Mini Breakthrough \n\nOn How Intelligent Works In Human Brain \n(Is A Directional Tensors)\nThat Leads To The Direction Of The Path\n\nI Won't Shares It,\nI Decided To Keeps All My \nIntellectual Properties\nPlus, It Could Be Wrong,\nAnd Makes Me Looks Like A Jackwanker\nIf I Spills The How,\n\n\nThe Idea Is How the Brains Works With Limited In Storages\nAnd Data And Such,\n\nI Have Been Pondering,\nWhat If The Brains Is\nConstantly Changing\nNvr Stops,\n\nIs Why There Is Not A Singular Model Of The Human \nIntelligent Brains,\n\nFor Scientists, The How Is Always One Aims For,\nYet For Me,\nIs Alwasy The Why?\nY This,\nY That?\n\nSomthing That Constanly Changes\nAs A System\nIs That Somthing \nCan't Be Capture By Simple Machines\n\nAnd I Belives For A System That Keeps Changin\nThe Human Mind,\nThen The Mind Must Allows It To,\n\nIs Like Some Stubborn People Will Nvr Changes,\nThen His Or Her Mind Is Simply\nLess Dynamically\nMore Static Than Those \n\nThere The Intelligent Plays A Role,\nThen \n\nWhen The Brain Is Overwhelmed\n\nWether Is From Too Much Data Inputs\nOr Too Emotional \nFrom Recalling Some Memoreis\nThat Exists Somewhere\n\nFucks, \nVery Sleepy\n\nProbably Catch A Sleep\n\nThe Mind Is Elusive\nThat Keeps Changing\n\nThat Is The Model Of \nDa AI\n\nWhy Does A MInd Keeps Changing\nAnd Gets Tired\nAfter Hitting It With Overwhelmed Amounts \n\nThe Synaptic Or Branches \nOf Neuron Model Is Simplely Too Simplestic\n\nIt Doesn't Needs A Neuroscietnsits to figured That Out,\nEmotionals Also Exists In The Mind,\nWhen Overwhelm\n\nWe Sees Emotions Abandons All Logics\nJust Like The \nData Set Discards All Of Is\nMemoreis Of Sciences\n\nThat Said\nSleepy,\n\nTo Creates Intelligent\nThe 5 Questions Must Be \nFully Completed Answered\n\nSo The Full Understanding of The Brain's Intelligent\nCan Be Propagated Through\n\nIt Is Not The Scaling Issues\nNor Problems\n\nScaling Doesnt' Lies In The Range Set Of\nHow AI Works,\nAlirhgt,\n\nEnough\nI Needs To Sleeps \n\n\nGeorge Is Wrong\nSo Is Many Brothers And Sisters\nWho Supports The \nScaling theory Of A.I.\n\nSince By Definition \nOf Limitation\n\nI Knows That Scaling For Infinity\nIs Not The Equivalence \nSet Of Limitation.\n\nScaling Wont' Solves A.I.\nFind Another Paths,\nLooks For Other 4 HorseWankers\n\nOn Earth\nD2, Out",
"sig": "0ef2e310dc945a581ca4a9b92d1330cd5a37a45e3caf99c48f4eebc4204d32010bd297f6e469334a4742e660d4b02fc9bff6fc78fd26a535d0537ed8020aaaa9"
}