📅 Original date posted:2015-09-28
📝 Original message:My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting?
On September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>There is *no* consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It
>will result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV
>wallets
>will become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that,
>as
>it's entirely avoidable.
>
>Make it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.
>
>Until then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:
>
>1) Drop the "everyone must agree to make changes" idea that people here
>like to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is
>correctly
>informed
>
>2) Do nothing
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150928/0eabc6d7/attachment.html>;
Eric Lombrozo [ARCHIVE] /
npub1az…t2krq
2023-06-07 17:41:31
in reply to nevent1q…75eh
Author Public Key
npub1azvhdrf9fu6n0tm7yez4j6zcxcedp2ct6nrcq3z74naqs7kgpk8s5t2krqPublished at
2023-06-07 17:41:31Event JSON
{
"id": "6caf5c9e9da88a234324cbba0749c6e52cc4f709154d1cd358bec82badbce2ad",
"pubkey": "e899768d254f3537af7e26455968583632d0ab0bd4c780445eacfa087ac80d8f",
"created_at": 1686159691,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f5bb1bf208994917ac3ec4154383520df2a8573df815c54d28bae4e41ef024c8",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"39af3ea06cbd7ac7f7cdd3efaa61d14c3e4e73218755263e5a847c135568026f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a384795310cea1937dda4d01ee8f14ca734b9a7ab60c62114a5656706e15e47f"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-09-28\n📝 Original message:My initial reaction is just HUH?!?!? Is this some sophisticated form of humor I'm just not getting?\n\nOn September 28, 2015 3:48:57 AM PDT, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eThere is *no* consensus on using a soft fork to deploy this feature. It\n\u003ewill result in the same problems as all the other soft forks - SPV\n\u003ewallets\n\u003ewill become less reliable during the rollout period. I am against that,\n\u003eas\n\u003eit's entirely avoidable.\n\u003e\n\u003eMake it a hard fork and my objection will be dropped.\n\u003e\n\u003eUntil then, as there is no consensus, you need to do one of two things:\n\u003e\n\u003e1) Drop the \"everyone must agree to make changes\" idea that people here\n\u003elike to peddle, and do it loudly, so everyone in the community is\n\u003ecorrectly\n\u003einformed\n\u003e\n\u003e2) Do nothing\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\n\u003e_______________________________________________\n\u003ebitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003ebitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003ehttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\n-- \nSent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150928/0eabc6d7/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "e6b69dfba7a0b86e4b7beda319ee1536d07c0676efd037a62c592e5d05d8dab8c1286fc60064ad1a496af3923caf68be4b564c00b32acae86f71f8e64bff21e9"
}