📅 Original date posted:2014-08-23
📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 07:02:55PM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:44:15 PM Mike Hearn wrote:
> > > Not to mention encrypting basically non-sensitive inter-node traffic is
> > > almost completely worthless in providing anonymity anyway...
> >
> > Recall that P2P connections carry Bloom filters too, which are not public
> > information.
>
> As soon as you tell it to an unknown/public peer, it is public information.
Mike is correct here: It *might* be public information, and probably
won't be. We already can give weak assurance that it probably won't be
against many weaker attackers, simply because getting lots of IP
addresses is moderately expensive, and in the future additional methods
will be developed and deployed.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000239344fc532bbad8a679e3fc30e8900772523a10c4720a0c
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140823/e395fd7f/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 15:25:25
in reply to nevent1q…ape7
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:25:25Event JSON
{
"id": "66907ddb37a5ca74a320ebdefad41fe7ce2866247278409f1d429ba3850de04a",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686151525,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"f7d80207f3f3e09247c97d3e8c17b8e8b9ffc855be5e4ac09f019815084b2528",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"228207d8cc892adc4f3ac6f5c50fccc1acaf88ac2c239a15e3ffb4ce28522284",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-08-23\n📝 Original message:On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 07:02:55PM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:\n\u003e On Saturday, August 23, 2014 6:44:15 PM Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e \u003e \u003e Not to mention encrypting basically non-sensitive inter-node traffic is\n\u003e \u003e \u003e almost completely worthless in providing anonymity anyway...\n\u003e \u003e \n\u003e \u003e Recall that P2P connections carry Bloom filters too, which are not public\n\u003e \u003e information.\n\u003e \n\u003e As soon as you tell it to an unknown/public peer, it is public information.\n\nMike is correct here: It *might* be public information, and probably\nwon't be. We already can give weak assurance that it probably won't be\nagainst many weaker attackers, simply because getting lots of IP\naddresses is moderately expensive, and in the future additional methods\nwill be developed and deployed.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n0000000000000000239344fc532bbad8a679e3fc30e8900772523a10c4720a0c\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140823/e395fd7f/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "c67e3952679e56bd89b97d9d58d08ff29b2f4834ef14920755fb294b98a2e5dfd7eaa793c57d233e79d11d0e5b826021b33ae37a9583825d1546a50bf8bde86c"
}