📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23
📝 Original message:On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas at bitsofproof.com> wrote:
> So you agree, that SSS should not contain specific flag for testnet?
>
> Or for that matter not even BIP32 needs them since it is not an address to
> send to.
I think the convention we have so far is that addresses and address
relate thing we share normally contain an opaque 'version' identifier
which we use to identify the purpose for the data (E.g. network
meaning, etc.) and I think its a generally reasonable custom.
Gregory Maxwell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1f2…crwet
2023-06-07 15:17:15
in reply to nevent1q…suya
Author Public Key
npub1f2nvlx49er5c7sqa43src6ssyp6snd4qwvtkwm5avc2l84cs84esecrwetPublished at
2023-06-07 15:17:15Event JSON
{
"id": "66fe825bddd313ef0e5d8b2d7aad7f789a88111732c1f58d4e1f1cc4f7c9b0ab",
"pubkey": "4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73",
"created_at": 1686151035,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ec3db7ea61043d2181c683590cc6472afc1e727a155c1437be680d2ee4f9939c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"9d4bf620ebccf8cad6dff418bea79d68eadc5a78d1828d1053a5890cd691f0a0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"c632841665fccdabf021322b1d969539c9c1f829ceed38844fea24e8512962d7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-04-23\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Tamas Blummer \u003ctamas at bitsofproof.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e So you agree, that SSS should not contain specific flag for testnet?\n\u003e\n\u003e Or for that matter not even BIP32 needs them since it is not an address to\n\u003e send to.\n\nI think the convention we have so far is that addresses and address\nrelate thing we share normally contain an opaque 'version' identifier\nwhich we use to identify the purpose for the data (E.g. network\nmeaning, etc.) and I think its a generally reasonable custom.",
"sig": "a06b2f36570f4d3a9e23a9f8f1d3481b3beeea866f45886ec7831661be8329acabd3a535efe70562ceb8ce80c25e11cb3970d998693c97ed2ee91e5be56d516a"
}